You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In <strong>the</strong> following scene in <strong>the</strong> documentary, you see pictures from <strong>the</strong><br />
Wounded Knee Massacre, which occurred in December 1890, and remains<br />
one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> largest massacres in US history. As you see dead <strong>Indigenous</strong><br />
bodies, you can hear Samuel L. Jackson narrate, “It reveals <strong>the</strong> weakness,<br />
even <strong>the</strong> panic, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adversary.”<br />
This sequence <strong>of</strong> scenes is both disturbing and illuminating. It reveals<br />
<strong>the</strong> erasure <strong>of</strong> Native people in <strong>the</strong> contemporary sense, as well as <strong>the</strong> fear<br />
that Black people have <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir demise—<strong>the</strong>y know what white people have<br />
done and can do. Imagining Black death is cruel indeed, but seeing<br />
<strong>Indigenous</strong> death with no illustration <strong>of</strong> people who fought against settler<br />
encroachment is bone-chilling. It perpetuates <strong>the</strong> settler nation-states’ myth<br />
constructed as a fact, <strong>of</strong> <strong>Indigenous</strong> disappearance.<br />
Native people did not disappear. The Native disappearance myth is as<br />
old as <strong>the</strong> founding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. Just as racism is embedded into <strong>the</strong><br />
fabric <strong>of</strong> society, so, too, is <strong>Indigenous</strong> disappearance. 61 Native people have<br />
fought and continue to fight. Whe<strong>the</strong>r it is <strong>the</strong> Shawnee warrior trying to<br />
carve out land for <strong>Indigenous</strong> peoples, or <strong>the</strong> water protectors at Standing<br />
Rock trying to halt <strong>the</strong> building <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dakota Access Pipeline, or<br />
<strong>Indigenous</strong> rappers producing rhymes to assert <strong>the</strong>ir presence, Native<br />
people are not disappearing, and will exist in <strong>the</strong> aftermath <strong>of</strong> settler<br />
colonialism and white supremacy.<br />
These scenes demonstrate a tension between Black liberation and<br />
<strong>Indigenous</strong> dispossession. They elucidate how <strong>the</strong> settler state constructed<br />
<strong>the</strong> parallel but different treatment <strong>of</strong> Black and <strong>Indigenous</strong> peoples and<br />
continues to construct it today, and also how Blacks construct an idea <strong>of</strong><br />
liberation.<br />
REMIX AND REFLECTION ON BALDWIN<br />
As you can see, I was critical not just <strong>of</strong> Baldwin but also <strong>of</strong> Peck and <strong>the</strong><br />
imagery he used. However, I want to explain my new reluctance to be so<br />
critical. First, I think that <strong>the</strong>re are some Native people that used my own<br />
work to readily engage in antiblackness. It’s a hard thing to prove, but <strong>the</strong><br />
fact that some were so easily in agreement (even excited?) about my<br />
criticism <strong>of</strong> a Black civil rights legend and literary giant made me pause. Is<br />
it because Native people want some clout? It’s hard to tell. However, I want<br />
to give Baldwin more context and engage in some <strong>of</strong> his work as it relates