09.06.2022 Views

An Afro-Indigenous History of the United States

by Kyle T. Mays

by Kyle T. Mays

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

consumption, to grow <strong>the</strong> domestic market, (2) land as production resource<br />

for export to <strong>the</strong> world markets for hard exchange, (3) land as space for<br />

national unity, (4) land as a place for a state, ei<strong>the</strong>r a national state or<br />

multinational state. 44<br />

If land is central, how does Alkalimat also forget that we live in a settler<br />

state? If land is a space for national unity or a multinational state, as<br />

Alkalimat argues, where are <strong>Indigenous</strong> people supposed to go? We do not<br />

know because Malcolm X never went on record about what he might do<br />

with <strong>the</strong> “<strong>Indigenous</strong> question,” likely because he believed that <strong>the</strong> “white<br />

man” had exterminated <strong>the</strong> “Indian.”<br />

Malcolm’s style, frankness, and ability to “make it plain” for his<br />

audience made him one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more well-known, if not beloved, Black<br />

activists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1960s. As a result, he remains, among a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

activists, from Black nationalists to communists, an icon long after his<br />

death. Although he did not invent <strong>the</strong> Nation <strong>of</strong> Islam or its rhetoric <strong>of</strong><br />

Black supremacy, his efforts made that discourse open to both <strong>the</strong> Black<br />

and white public spheres, with mixed results. Yet, as powerful a rhetorician<br />

as he was, Malcolm X was, on <strong>the</strong> one hand, a powerful voice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Black<br />

oppressed, and, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, an uncritical participant in settlercolonial<br />

discourse, at least early on in his political development. In o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

words, he accepted <strong>the</strong> European American belief that Native people had<br />

disappeared. Malcolm based his belief that <strong>the</strong> US government owed Black<br />

people land on two conclusions: one, because Native people were<br />

“invisible” as a result <strong>of</strong> being duped out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir land, <strong>the</strong> US government<br />

had land that it could entrust to Black people; and two, Black folks had<br />

earned a right to land through <strong>the</strong>ir labor during slavery.<br />

Malcolm believed that Black separation from whites was essential for<br />

Black freedom. That is, white Americans were not going to truly accept<br />

Black people into <strong>the</strong>ir society; <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>y should have land <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

own. While civil rights activists sought to reform US society so that it<br />

would become integrated, Malcolm reminded Black people that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

weren’t anything more than second-class citizens, and would never be full<br />

citizens because, unlike white people, Black people “didn’t come here on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Mayflower.” 45 Instead, he reminded <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong>y were brought here by<br />

<strong>the</strong> architects <strong>of</strong> US democracy.<br />

He also argued that Black people were owed land because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

exploited labor and <strong>the</strong> blood <strong>the</strong>y had shed in wars. Black people had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!