09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y <strong>Enron</strong> to keep high-debt assets like power plants <strong>of</strong>f <strong>Enron</strong>'s balance sheet. Alexander told Lay<br />

that assertions <strong>of</strong> accounting irregularity were swirling within <strong>Enron</strong> and that there were stories <strong>of</strong><br />

deal-makers enriching themselves to the Company's detriment. When confronted, Lay simply said<br />

he would have <strong>Enron</strong>'s president look into the matter, ended the discussion and did nothing. Other<br />

former Global Power executives agreed that this was an early example <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s aggressive<br />

financial techniques and a precursor to the later deal-making with controlled entities that led to<br />

<strong>Enron</strong>'s collapse:<br />

"We were the dead canary in the coal mine," Mr. Alexander said.<br />

Accounting principles generally prohibit a company from basing its pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

on sales to a subsidiary. But Mr. Alexander's team worked closely with <strong>Enron</strong>'s<br />

accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, and its main law firm, Vinson & Elkins, to create<br />

a corporate structure that allowed <strong>Enron</strong> to own 52 percent <strong>of</strong> the stock <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong><br />

Global Power and Pipelines while maintaining that the unit was independent enough<br />

to characterize the sales as pr<strong>of</strong>it-making transactions ... Mr. Alexander said. "How<br />

do you have a major interest without having control?"<br />

New York Times, 2/20/02.<br />

8. However, during mid-97, <strong>Enron</strong> encountered problems due to a huge ($400+ million)<br />

loss on a British natural gas transaction and a $100 million charge due to MTBE transactions, which<br />

called into question its trading skills and risk management capabilities and which resulted in analysts<br />

downgrading <strong>Enron</strong>'s stock and lowering their forecasts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s future earnings per share ("EPS")<br />

growth. <strong>Enron</strong>'s stock price lost one-third <strong>of</strong> its value by the Fall <strong>of</strong> 97 and <strong>Enron</strong>'s executives'<br />

performance-based bonuses were slashed. <strong>The</strong>se events were very disturbing to <strong>Enron</strong>'s top<br />

executives and Board members who were determined to halt <strong>Enron</strong>'s stock price decline and get the<br />

stock to advance back to much higher levels. <strong>The</strong>y knew this could only be accomplished by having<br />

<strong>Enron</strong> report stronger-than-expected financial results going forward, thus enabling it to credibly<br />

- 8 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!