09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

day-to-day activities would be managed by <strong>Enron</strong> insiders Fastow, Kopper, and Glisan. It explained<br />

that "[t]he Partnership expects that <strong>Enron</strong> will be the Partnership's primary source <strong>of</strong> investment<br />

opportunities" and that it "expects to benefit from having the opportunity to invest in <strong>Enron</strong>-<br />

generated investment opportunities that would not be available otherwise to outside investors."<br />

It specifically noted that Fastow's "access to <strong>Enron</strong>'s information pertaining to potential<br />

investments will contribute to superior returns." In addition, investors were told that a similar<br />

Fastow controlled partnership (JEDI) that had done deals with <strong>Enron</strong> like the ones LJM2 would<br />

do had tripled their investment in just two years and that overall returns <strong>of</strong> 2,500% to LJM2<br />

investors were actually anticipated, In short, the non-public <strong>of</strong>fering memorandum Vinson &<br />

Elkins participated in drafting was an invitation to join in the benefits <strong>of</strong> self-dealing transactions<br />

with <strong>Enron</strong>.<br />

814. Vinson & Elkins knew it was indispensable that LJM2 be formed before year-end 99<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the need to use it as a vehicle to consummate several transactions with <strong>Enron</strong> before year-<br />

end 99 to create huge pr<strong>of</strong>its for <strong>Enron</strong> in the 4thQ 99 so that <strong>Enron</strong> could meet and exceed its<br />

forecasted 99 earnings. However, as had been the case with Chewco at year-end 97, there was<br />

tremendous time pressure and it could not get done. Merrill Lynch could not raise the money from<br />

outside investors in LJM2 in time to fund LJM2 by year-end 99 with sufficient capital to enable it<br />

to do the desperately needed transactions with <strong>Enron</strong>. So, with the knowledge <strong>of</strong> Vinson & Elkins,<br />

on or about 12/22/99, certain <strong>Enron</strong> bankers, knowing that LJM2 was going to be an extraordinarily<br />

lucrative investment anyway created documentation that enabled the banks to advance virtually<br />

100% <strong>of</strong> the monies needed to initially fund LJM2, i.e., many times more than the banks' allocated<br />

shares in 12/99. Key year-end LJM deals, involving LJM, detailed elsewhere, were:<br />

- 554 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!