09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

41. Just eight months after announcing this contract with great fanfare and just weeks<br />

after representing that testing <strong>of</strong> the system in four cities had succeeded and that the service was<br />

being launched nationwide, <strong>Enron</strong> was forced to abandon the venture due to the failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s<br />

technology and the inability <strong>of</strong> Blockbuster to obtain the ability to provide content in digital format.<br />

But <strong>Enron</strong> did not reverse the huge pr<strong>of</strong>its it had secretly recorded and improperly reported on this<br />

transaction earlier, for to do so would have not only exposed its ongoing abuse and misuse <strong>of</strong> mark-<br />

to-market accounting, but also would have crushed <strong>Enron</strong>'s stock at a time when <strong>Enron</strong> and the other<br />

participants in the scheme were desperately attempting to support <strong>Enron</strong>'s then falling stock price<br />

so that it would not fall below certain trigger prices in the SPE agreements which would obligate<br />

<strong>Enron</strong> to pay <strong>of</strong>f investors in the SPEs. CIBC did not force <strong>Enron</strong> to honor its secret guarantee<br />

against losses, as it knew to do so would undermine <strong>Enron</strong>'s fragile financial condition, but rather,<br />

carried it as part <strong>of</strong> its overall exposure to <strong>Enron</strong>. After CIBC became an investor in the Blockbuster<br />

VOD joint venture with <strong>Enron</strong> and received its secret guarantee, CIBC refused to disclose its<br />

economic relationship with <strong>Enron</strong> or its affiliates, continuing to use the same "boilerplate"<br />

disclosures in its analyst reports on <strong>Enron</strong>, concealing its investment and resulting conflicts <strong>of</strong><br />

interest.<br />

H. New Power<br />

42. Another example <strong>of</strong> how <strong>Enron</strong>, Vinson & Elkins, Andersen and CIBC falsified<br />

<strong>Enron</strong>'s reported results is the New Power transaction, including the New Power IPO, by which<br />

<strong>Enron</strong> improperly recognized $370 million in pr<strong>of</strong>its in the 4thQ 00. In 00, <strong>Enron</strong> owned millions<br />

<strong>of</strong> shares <strong>of</strong> New Power stock – then a private company – and controlled New Power. If <strong>Enron</strong> could<br />

take New Power public and create a trading market in its stock, then <strong>Enron</strong> could recognize a pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

on the gain in value on its shares by "hedging" that gain via yet another non-arm's length transaction<br />

- 32 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!