09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

959. As detailed herein, <strong>Enron</strong>'s disclosures with respect to its accounting practices and<br />

related parties were woefully inadequate. <strong>The</strong> Company failed to adequately disclose the<br />

transactions involving Chewco, the management involvement in LJM, the manipulative transactions<br />

involving the Raptors, the improper and abusive use <strong>of</strong> mark-to-market accounting, its improper use<br />

<strong>of</strong> its own stock to generate income, and the manipulative practices involving broadband and many<br />

other accounting manipulations. Andersen actually knew about many <strong>of</strong> these issues as it had helped<br />

develop the accounting for them. Yet Andersen did not require notification <strong>of</strong> the disclosures and<br />

did not issue a qualified or adverse opinion on <strong>Enron</strong>'s financial statements in violation <strong>of</strong> GAAS.<br />

960. As <strong>The</strong> Wall Street Journal noted on 11/5/01:<br />

Questions could well turn to whether Andersen fulfilled its obligation to protect<br />

investors' interests. And an important focus is likely to be whether Andersen should<br />

have required <strong>Enron</strong> to better explain its dealings with partnerships run by former<br />

Chief Financial <strong>Office</strong>r Andrew S. Fastow before agreeing to bless the company's<br />

financial statements.<br />

* * *<br />

For its part, <strong>Enron</strong> – which is hardly the only large energy company with complex<br />

partnership dealings – maintains its <strong>of</strong>f-balance-sheet transactions were legal and<br />

properly disclosed. "<strong>The</strong>y comply with reporting requirements," says <strong>Enron</strong><br />

spokeswoman Karen Denne, adding that Andersen was aware <strong>of</strong> the transactions and<br />

reviewed them.<br />

961. Contrary to GAAP, <strong>Enron</strong>'s disclosures were inadequate and contrary to GAAS,<br />

Andersen failed to require revision. As noted by <strong>The</strong> New York Times in 10/01, "<strong>Enron</strong>'s disclosures<br />

have been widely criticized for being impossible to understand." <strong>The</strong>se were the same disclosures<br />

with which Andersen had stated it was "very comfortable."<br />

K. Andersen's Destruction <strong>of</strong> Documents<br />

962. Beginning in 9/01 and continuing into 11/01, Andersen engaged in a worldwide<br />

campaign to destroy documents that could implicate them on the <strong>Enron</strong> fraud. Andersen destroyed,<br />

- 610 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!