09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

846. <strong>The</strong> "disclosures" above are false and misleading because <strong>Enron</strong> was buying back the<br />

same assets and investments which it was selling to Fastow. In some cases the assets were bought<br />

back within a matter <strong>of</strong> months and even before <strong>Enron</strong> filed its Report on Form 10-K 3/30/00 with<br />

the related-party disclosures indicating <strong>Enron</strong> was selling those assets. <strong>Enron</strong> bought back at least<br />

five <strong>of</strong> seven assets in the transactions referenced, including (1) the sale in 9/99 and subsequent<br />

repurchase <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s interest in the Cuiaba, Brazil power plant construction; (2) the sale on<br />

12/22/99 and subsequent repurchase <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong> North America collateralized loan obligations; (3) the<br />

sale on 12/21/99 and subsequent repurchase <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s interest in the Nowa Sarzyna, Poland power<br />

plant construction; (4) the sale on 12/29/99 and subsequent repurchase <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s equity interest in<br />

MEGS LLC; and (5) the sale in 5/00-6/00 and subsequent resale <strong>of</strong> dark fiber (<strong>Enron</strong>'s EBS sold the<br />

dark fiber to LJM2 and then resold the same dark fiber for LJM2). <strong>The</strong> related-party disclosures<br />

drafted and approved by Vinson & Elkins further did not reveal that in each <strong>of</strong> the "buybacks," the<br />

LJM partnerships pr<strong>of</strong>ited millions <strong>of</strong> dollars even when the assets lost value.<br />

Vinson & Elkins Concealed the Phony Nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the LJM and Raptors Transactions By<br />

Misrepresenting or Omitting Fastow's Interest<br />

in the Deals<br />

847. As <strong>Enron</strong>'s Special Investigative Committee concluded, "[t]he failure to set forth<br />

Fastow's compensation from the LJM transactions and the process leading to that decision raise<br />

substantial issues." Vinson & Elkins knew significant facts concerning Fastow's interest in the LJM<br />

transactions. But Vinson & Elkins avoided disclosure <strong>of</strong> these facts despite clear requirements in<br />

SEC regulations that they specifically be disclosed. Vinson & Elkins did not reveal Fastow's pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

and interest in the LJM transactions in each <strong>of</strong> the related-party disclosures drafted and approved by<br />

Vinson & Elkins during the Class Period. Had Vinson & Elkins disclosed Fastow's interest in the<br />

LJM transactions, viewed in light <strong>of</strong> proper descriptions <strong>of</strong> the transactions, this would have alerted<br />

- 568 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!