09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

comparable securities in the market, it was prohibitively expensive to hedge Rhythms commercially.<br />

<strong>Enron</strong> was also looking for a way to take advantage <strong>of</strong> an increase in value <strong>of</strong> its own stock. But<br />

under GAAP, a company cannot recognize an increase in value <strong>of</strong> its own stock (including forward<br />

contracts) as income. See APB No. 9, 28.<br />

455. To circumvent GAAP, <strong>Enron</strong> sought to use what it viewed as this "trapped" or<br />

"embedded" value <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong> stock. LJM1 was formed for this purpose and, immediately thereafter,<br />

the Rhythms transaction closed, on 6/30/99. <strong>The</strong> transaction had three principal elements: First,<br />

<strong>Enron</strong> released 3.4 million shares <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong> stock for transfer to LJM1, which on 6/30/99 had a value<br />

<strong>of</strong> $276 million. <strong>Enron</strong>, however, restricted the shares to preclude their sale or transfer for four<br />

years. <strong>The</strong> value <strong>of</strong> the shares was discounted by approximately $108 million (or 39%) to account<br />

for the restriction. <strong>The</strong> restriction did not, however, preclude LJM1 from pledging the shares as<br />

security for a loan. In exchange for these <strong>Enron</strong> shares, LJM1 gave <strong>Enron</strong> a note (due on 3/31/00)<br />

for $64 million. Second, LJM1 capitalized Swap Sub (a limited partner in LJM1) by transferring<br />

1.6 million <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Enron</strong> shares to Swap Sub, along with $3.75 million in cash. Third, <strong>Enron</strong><br />

received from Swap Sub a put option on 5.4 million shares <strong>of</strong> Rhythms stock, under which <strong>Enron</strong><br />

could require Swap Sub to purchase Rhythms shares at $56 per share in 6/04. <strong>The</strong> put option was<br />

valued at approximately $104 million.<br />

456. <strong>The</strong> purported "hedge" that <strong>Enron</strong> obtained on its Rhythms position with Swap Sub<br />

that was used as a justification to allow <strong>Enron</strong> to report gains and losses on its income statement was<br />

never a true economic hedge. This was because Swap Sub's ability to make good on the Rhythms<br />

put rested on the value <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Enron</strong> stock. As a consequence, Swap Sub could perform on the put<br />

only if <strong>Enron</strong> stock performed well. Under this scenario, if Rhythms stock declined, any losses<br />

would to be absorbed by the value in the <strong>Enron</strong> stock, but if <strong>Enron</strong> stock and Rhythms stock both<br />

- 338 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!