09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

equipment, a significant portion <strong>of</strong> which costs <strong>Enron</strong> knew it was likely never to recover and<br />

certainly never to make a pr<strong>of</strong>it on. <strong>Enron</strong> executives knew that <strong>Enron</strong> would lose money on the<br />

EES deals, but had to make them more and more attractive to generate new clients, while the<br />

Company utilized unrealistic projections and mark-to-market accounting to mislead investors into<br />

believing that the EES contracts were making money. For instance:<br />

(i) EES had originally targeted residential retail customers, but this failed<br />

due to insurmountable hurdles, including the fact that <strong>Enron</strong> did not have sufficient infrastructure<br />

to bill residential customers monthly. In 97, <strong>Enron</strong> transformed EES into a commercial-industrial<br />

business and then purportedly signed up several major customers, including Starwood Properties,<br />

Chase Bank, Eli Lilly, Owens-Corning, Simon Properties, the Archdiocese <strong>of</strong> Chicago, and others.<br />

However, EES still faced insurmountable hurdles: One, because each customer's contract was<br />

individualized, there were no economies-<strong>of</strong>-scale savings and the cost <strong>of</strong> performance precluded<br />

making a pr<strong>of</strong>it. Two, <strong>Enron</strong> still did not have sufficient infrastructure to do the monthly billing.<br />

Three, a prerequisite for each contract was for <strong>Enron</strong> to upgrade the customer's facilities with huge<br />

current capital expenditures, which was uneconomical and guaranteed losses on most contracts;<br />

(ii) EES entered into DSM contracts, which bundled energy-related<br />

products and services for its customers, including providing power and equipment as commodities<br />

to companies like J.C. Penney, Quaker Oats, IBM, Starwood Properties, Albertsons, Safeway, and<br />

others, along with long-term management and consulting services on the customers' usage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

power over the life <strong>of</strong> the contract. <strong>Enron</strong> booked 100% <strong>of</strong> the commodity portion <strong>of</strong> the contract<br />

up front, and 70% (on average) <strong>of</strong> the estimated long-term services revenue. Because the revenues<br />

from each contract were pulled into the single quarter when the contract was signed using mark-to-<br />

market accounting, EES had to close increasingly higher revenue-producing DSM transactions to<br />

- 270 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!