09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Even though a misstatement <strong>of</strong> an individual amount may not cause the financial<br />

statements taken as a whole to be materially misstated, it may nonetheless, when<br />

aggregated with other misstatements, render the financial statements taken as a whole<br />

to be materially misleading. Registrants and the auditors <strong>of</strong> their financial statements<br />

accordingly should consider the effect <strong>of</strong> the misstatement on subtotals or totals. <strong>The</strong><br />

auditor should aggregate all misstatements that affect each subtotal or total and<br />

consider whether the misstatements in the aggregate affect the subtotal or total in a<br />

way that causes the registrant's financial statements taken as a whole to be materially<br />

misleading.<br />

D. <strong>Enron</strong>'s Restatement Is an Admission the Prior<br />

Financial Statements Were Materially False<br />

518. <strong>The</strong> fact that <strong>Enron</strong> has restated its financial statements for 97 through the 2ndQ 01<br />

is an admission that the financial statements originally issued were false and that the overstatement<br />

<strong>of</strong> revenues and income was material. Pursuant to GAAP, as set forth in APB No. 20, the type <strong>of</strong><br />

restatement announced by <strong>Enron</strong> was to correct for material errors in its previously issued financial<br />

statements. See APB No. 20, 7-13. <strong>The</strong> restatement <strong>of</strong> past financial statements is a disfavored<br />

method <strong>of</strong> recognizing an accounting change as it dilutes confidence by investors in the financial<br />

statements, it makes it difficult to compare financial statements and it is <strong>of</strong>ten difficult, if not<br />

impossible, to generate the numbers when restatement occurs. See APB No. 20, 14. Thus, GAAP<br />

provides that financial statements should only be restated in limited circumstances, i.e., when there<br />

is a change in the reporting entity, there is a change in accounting principles used or to correct an<br />

error in previously issued financial statements. <strong>Enron</strong>'s restatement was not due to a change in<br />

reporting entity or a change in accounting principle, but rather, to misstatements in previously issued<br />

financial statements. Thus, the restatement is an admission by <strong>Enron</strong> that its previously issued<br />

financial results and its public statements regarding those results were false and misleading.<br />

519. <strong>The</strong> restatement <strong>of</strong> certain issues described above was, however, just the tip <strong>of</strong> the<br />

iceberg. <strong>Enron</strong> engaged in many other egregious manipulations which were not part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

restatement. As Accounting Malpractice.com noted on 2/22/02:<br />

- 360 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!