09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

614. <strong>The</strong> 12/31/97 Registration Statement, which incorporated <strong>Enron</strong>'s Form 10-K for the<br />

year-ended 12/31/96, also reported that Phase I <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s Dabhol plant was to begin commercial<br />

operations in 12/98. This was false and misleading because cost overruns on the Dabhol project and<br />

problems with political and regulatory <strong>of</strong>ficials, which had occurred by 12/31/97, ensured that the<br />

plant would likely never begin commercial operations on the terms represented and, if begun,<br />

commercial operations would result in huge losses because to break even <strong>Enron</strong> would have to<br />

charge its only customer (the Indian state government) four times the price other power generators<br />

were charging to supply electricity energy in order to recoup <strong>Enron</strong>'s investment.<br />

615. <strong>The</strong> Registration Statements also incorporated by reference all documents filed<br />

pursuant to §13(a) <strong>of</strong> the 1934 Act prior to the respective <strong>of</strong>ferings, including <strong>Enron</strong>'s subsequently<br />

filed 10-Ks, which misrepresented <strong>Enron</strong>'s financial results, including earnings, the debt-to-equity<br />

ratio, total debt, and shareholder equity, by failing to consolidate non-qualifying SPEs, as required<br />

by GAAP and numerous other accounting misstatements, as described in 418-611. <strong>The</strong><br />

subsequently filed 10-Qs were also incorporated by reference, and contained unaudited financial<br />

statements which were false and misleading as described therein. <strong>Enron</strong> has admitted these financial<br />

results were materially false. <strong>The</strong> 12/31/97 Registration Statement, for instance, incorporated the<br />

97 10-K since it was issued prior to the 7/7/98 and 11/24/98 notes <strong>of</strong>ferings. <strong>The</strong> 97 10-K misstated<br />

and understated the loss incurred by EES for 97, reported as $107 million, due to the overvaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the EES contracts and abuse <strong>of</strong> mark-to-market accounting, as detailed herein.<br />

616. <strong>The</strong> Offering Documents also made false and misleading statements about <strong>Enron</strong>'s<br />

financial-risk management and credit risk, concealing the substance, nature, and effect <strong>of</strong> the straw<br />

transactions <strong>Enron</strong> was entering with the bankers. Contrary to the house <strong>of</strong> cards defendants had<br />

- 397 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!