09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

915. Andersen also performed certain consulting services in such a way as to impair its<br />

independence on its audits and reviews. For example, during the early-to-mid 90's, as part <strong>of</strong> its<br />

relentless mission to sell more and more non-audit services to <strong>Enron</strong>, Andersen set its sights on<br />

stealing <strong>Enron</strong>'s important internal audit oversight function away from <strong>Enron</strong>'s own internal auditors,<br />

and selling the service itself to <strong>Enron</strong> on an outsourced, contract basis. Andersen and other big<br />

accounting firms had successfully lobbied the AICPA to allow the practice on a limited basis, the<br />

dual role <strong>of</strong> internal and external auditor was extremely controversial, and many outside the "big six<br />

accounting firms" saw it as an outrageous conflict <strong>of</strong> interest. In <strong>Enron</strong>'s case, Andersen's internal<br />

audit consulting turned out to be just that. For example, by stripping <strong>Enron</strong>'s internal audit function<br />

<strong>of</strong> its power and assuming most <strong>of</strong> the responsibilities itself, Andersen effectively eliminated the<br />

potential that another independent oversight body would discover and report the fraud. As a former<br />

<strong>Enron</strong> employee involved in the transition to Andersen performing internal audit characterized it,<br />

"Going forward, Skilling was left to run a casino for a business, with a day-care center for an<br />

auditor."<br />

916. Andersen's obsession with generating consulting fees from <strong>Enron</strong> caused a significant<br />

conflict <strong>of</strong> interest while performing <strong>Enron</strong>'s audits and reviews during the Class Period, and was<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the factors that led to the impairment <strong>of</strong> the firm's integrity, objectivity and independence.<br />

In fact, recent conclusions reached by the very committee Andersen established and funded to look<br />

into its own policies as a result <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Enron</strong> debacle are in effect, an acknowledgment that such<br />

conflicts do exist and did impair Andersen's independence on the <strong>Enron</strong> audits. On 3/11/02, less<br />

than ten days after accepting the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the blue-ribbon committee at Andersen's behest,<br />

Chairman Paul Volcker quickly came to the conclusion that, among other things, if Andersen was<br />

to resolve the kinds <strong>of</strong> conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest and impairment <strong>of</strong> independence that caused the problems<br />

- 586 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!