09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> employee adds that anyone who questioned suspect deals quickly<br />

learned to accept assurances <strong>of</strong> outside lawyers and accountants. She says there<br />

was little scrutiny <strong>of</strong> whether the earnings were real or how they were booked. <strong>The</strong><br />

more people pushed the envelope with aggressive accounting, she says, the harder<br />

they would have to push the next year. "It's like being a heroin junkie," she said.<br />

"How do you go cold turkey?"<br />

Business Week, 2/25/02. In fact, in mid-8/01, an <strong>Enron</strong> executive (who was a former Andersen<br />

accountant) wrote Lay, telling him the Company was "nothing but an elaborate accounting hoax,"<br />

and, in referring to the SPE transactions, that nothing "will protect <strong>Enron</strong> if these transactions are<br />

ever disclosed in the bright light <strong>of</strong> day" – warning that many employees believed "[W]e're such<br />

a crooked company."<br />

M. Late 00/Early 01 Prop-Up<br />

52. In late 00/early 01, <strong>Enron</strong>'s financial results began to come under scrutiny from a few<br />

accounting sleuths and short-sellers, who began to question the quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s reported financial<br />

results. While <strong>Enron</strong>, its top insiders and its bankers assured investors <strong>of</strong> the correctness <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s<br />

accounting and the high quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s reported earnings, the success and strength <strong>of</strong> its business<br />

and its solid prospects for continued strong pr<strong>of</strong>it growth, in part because <strong>of</strong> this increasing<br />

controversy, <strong>Enron</strong> stock began to decline. As this price decline accelerated, it put pressure on<br />

<strong>Enron</strong>'s top executives to do something – anything – to halt the decline in the price <strong>of</strong> the stock as<br />

they knew that if that price decline continued and the stock fell to lower levels, more and more <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Enron</strong> stock "triggers" contained in agreements for deals with entities controlled by Chewco,<br />

LJM1 and LJM2 would be triggered, which would require <strong>Enron</strong> to issue over 100 million shares<br />

<strong>of</strong> its common stock to those partnerships, causing a huge reduction in <strong>Enron</strong>'s shareholders'<br />

equity.<br />

53. In late 3/01, inside <strong>Enron</strong> it appeared that <strong>Enron</strong> would be required to take a pre-<br />

tax charge against earnings <strong>of</strong> more than $500 million to reflect a shortfall in credit capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

- 44 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!