09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

million per year amount considering the multi-disciplinary services being provided.<br />

Such amount did not trouble the participants as long as the nature <strong>of</strong> the services was<br />

not an issue.<br />

913. In another example, Andersen partners at the highest level removed partner Carl Bass<br />

from his oversight role on the <strong>Enron</strong> audits because he continued to oppose <strong>Enron</strong>'s improper<br />

accounting practices and Andersen's complicity therein. Bass was a top accounting expert in<br />

Andersen's internal Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Standards Group – a national team <strong>of</strong> experts whose job was to<br />

review and approve accounting and auditing questions facing local <strong>of</strong>fices. As early as 99, Bass had<br />

strongly objected to <strong>Enron</strong>'s accounting. Again in February, March and December 00 and March 01,<br />

e-mails, Bass continued to express his disagreement with <strong>Enron</strong> and other Andersen partners over<br />

<strong>Enron</strong>'s improper accounting. This eventually upset <strong>Enron</strong> management. As a consequence,<br />

defendant Richard Causey, with defendant David Duncan's help, pressed top Andersen management<br />

in Chicago to have Bass removed from the account. Causey went so far as to bring this up in a<br />

personal meeting with Andersen CEO Berardino on 2/21/01. Three weeks later, top Andersen<br />

management removed Bass from his job <strong>of</strong> providing oversight and approval <strong>of</strong> accounting issues<br />

to Andersen's <strong>Enron</strong> audit team.<br />

914. Andersen's close relationship with management was another significant contributing<br />

factor in impairing Andersen's independence and objectivity on its <strong>Enron</strong> audits during the Class<br />

Period. For example, at one time, former Andersen auditors and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals occupied upwards<br />

<strong>of</strong> 300 accounting and finance positions at <strong>Enron</strong>, many in mid-level and senior management. In<br />

fact, <strong>Enron</strong> was the world's largest single employer <strong>of</strong> Andersen alumni. <strong>Enron</strong> defendants liked the<br />

relationship as they knew that current Andersen auditors were much less likely to challenge the<br />

improper accounting done by their former Andersen co-workers and bosses that were now <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

and managers at <strong>Enron</strong>.<br />

- 585 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!