09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in order for the financial statements to not be misleading. However, <strong>Enron</strong> told Andersen it did not<br />

want to make the adjustments, because the adjustments would dramatically reduce the $105 million<br />

in the net income figure <strong>Enron</strong> management was going to report to the public. As alleged above,<br />

because <strong>Enron</strong> was such a lucrative client, Andersen partners associated with the engagement<br />

acquiesced to <strong>Enron</strong> management and did not insist that the adjustments be made. In failing to do<br />

so, Andersen abandoned its role as the public watchdog and violated GAAS. However, due to the<br />

sheer size <strong>of</strong> the collective adjustments – almost 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s net income, Andersen could not<br />

simply waive the adjustments in its workpapers without concocting some sort <strong>of</strong> justification.<br />

Andersen's obfuscation was as follows: In calculating whether $51 million in adjustments were<br />

material to the financial statements, it was obvious to Andersen that if it calculated the needed<br />

adjustment as a percentage <strong>of</strong> net income, as auditors universally do, the resulting answer <strong>of</strong> 50%<br />

<strong>of</strong> net income was clearly material. To divert attention from this reality, Andersen calculated the $51<br />

million as a percentage <strong>of</strong> a contrived figure Andersen called "normalized earnings" instead <strong>of</strong> net<br />

income. By cooking up this supposed measure <strong>of</strong> materiality, Andersen improperly declared that<br />

because the $51 million adjustment was only 8% <strong>of</strong> "normalized earnings" (instead <strong>of</strong> a whopping<br />

50% <strong>of</strong> net income) it was somehow immaterial and therefore no adjustment was necessary. By<br />

concocting a justification for waiving these necessary adjustments, Andersen demonstrated the<br />

depths it would sink to in order to please <strong>Enron</strong> management. In doing so, Andersen improperly<br />

allowed <strong>Enron</strong> to overstate income in 97 by $51 million.<br />

956. <strong>Enron</strong> has now restated its financial statements for 97 through 00 and Andersen has<br />

stated that the audit reports covering the year-end financial statements for 97 through 00 "should not<br />

be relied upon." Unfortunately for the thousands <strong>of</strong> investors who had already relied upon<br />

- 608 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!