09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50.00%<br />

45.00%<br />

40.00%<br />

35.00%<br />

30.00%<br />

25.00%<br />

<strong>Enron</strong> <strong>Corp</strong>oration<br />

Debt to Equity Ratio<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000<br />

As reported As restated<br />

421. <strong>The</strong> restatement adversely affected these debt and earnings ratios significantly:<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000<br />

Debt to Equity<br />

As reported 44.6% 41.9% 38.5% 40.9%<br />

As restated 48.3% 44.8% 42.1% 44.3%<br />

Ratio <strong>of</strong> Earnings to Fixed Charges<br />

As reported 1.02 2.08 2.29 2.34<br />

As restated .88 1.94 2.03 2.23<br />

422. <strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> the restatement, however, was just the tip <strong>of</strong> the iceberg. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Enron</strong><br />

Defendants engaged in many other egregious manipulations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s financial statements which<br />

were not part <strong>of</strong> the restatement. As Accounting Malpractice.com noted on 2/22/02:<br />

Each passing week raises a new concern about not only the original financial<br />

reporting but also the veracity <strong>of</strong> the restatement itself. <strong>The</strong> emerging question is not<br />

whether a more conservative restatement would have reflected smaller pr<strong>of</strong>its, but<br />

whether a proper restatement would have reflected any pr<strong>of</strong>its from 1997 and<br />

forward?<br />

- 324 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!