09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ooked the transaction as a loan." However, <strong>Enron</strong> kept the loans <strong>of</strong>f its balance sheet by<br />

accounting for the loans from CS First Boston and CitiGroup as "assets from price risk<br />

management" and as "accounts receivable."<br />

46. <strong>The</strong> secret <strong>of</strong>fshore JP Morgan "Mahonia" and CitiGroup "Delta" transactions<br />

substantially increased in monetary amount at the end <strong>of</strong> 00 and then during 01 as <strong>Enron</strong>'s stock price<br />

began to decline sharply and pierced certain <strong>of</strong> the higher priced equity issuance triggers, and the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the Raptor SPEs threatened to collapse for lack <strong>of</strong> credit capacity. JP Morgan and<br />

CitiGroup knew that this created the threat <strong>of</strong> a death spiral for <strong>Enron</strong>. Also, by this time <strong>Enron</strong>'s<br />

accumulated financial chicanery had created a liquidity crunch inside <strong>Enron</strong>, which made <strong>Enron</strong><br />

increasingly desperate for additional cash to try to stave <strong>of</strong>f its growing liquidity problems. <strong>Enron</strong>,<br />

JP Morgan and CitiGroup substantially increased the amount <strong>of</strong> money flowing to <strong>Enron</strong> in the<br />

disguised loan transactions they were engaging in, i.e., the phony commodity oil and gas trades and<br />

swaps. By so doing, JP Morgan and CitiGroup were able to secretly prop up <strong>Enron</strong>'s deteriorating<br />

finances without any disclosure that in fact <strong>Enron</strong> had just borrowed between $4-$6 billion from<br />

those two banks. Had these phony commodity and swap transactions in fact been treated as the bank<br />

loans that they really were, the internal procedures at JP Morgan and CitiGroup would have required<br />

a syndication <strong>of</strong> those loans to other lending institutions – but that would have greatly increased the<br />

scope <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> the liquidity problems <strong>Enron</strong> was then encountering. Also, any attempt to<br />

even put together loans <strong>of</strong> this size, either by JP Morgan or CitiGroup (individually or collectively),<br />

would have quickly become public knowledge in the financial community and been reported in<br />

specialized journals which follow bank lending syndication activity. And because <strong>of</strong> the high pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong> and the controversy over its finances, attempted borrowings <strong>of</strong> this size would have been<br />

reported on by the financial press. This would not only have called into question the health <strong>of</strong><br />

- 37 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!