09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

not non-recourse because if <strong>Enron</strong>'s credit rating was downgraded that debt would become recourse<br />

as to <strong>Enron</strong>. This was an extraordinarily dangerous situation for <strong>Enron</strong> because, in fact, based upon<br />

its true financial condition, which was known to its insiders, <strong>Enron</strong> did not deserve the investment-<br />

grade credit rating it was carrying and it was in constant and precarious danger <strong>of</strong> losing that rating<br />

when the true structure <strong>of</strong> its <strong>of</strong>f-balance-sheet partnerships and SPEs became known and its true<br />

financial condition was revealed.<br />

(m) In fact, <strong>Enron</strong> did not deserve an investment-grade credit rating and did not<br />

have a solid or substantial financial structure because it was inflating the value <strong>of</strong> its assets by<br />

billions <strong>of</strong> dollars while concealing billions <strong>of</strong> dollars <strong>of</strong> debt that should have been on its balance<br />

sheet. As a result, <strong>Enron</strong>'s true financial structure was extremely fragile.<br />

(n) Azurix was not becoming a major global water company nor was it accretive<br />

to <strong>Enron</strong>'s earnings. <strong>Enron</strong> had grossly overpaid for Wessex Water – hundreds <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> dollars<br />

more than the English company was really worth – which <strong>Enron</strong> knew meant it would not be<br />

accretive to <strong>Enron</strong> but, in fact, would result in a later writedown <strong>of</strong> that overvalued asset. And <strong>Enron</strong><br />

created the purported worldwide-water business without any adequate feasibility study or the<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> any detailed business plan, thus rendering the venture one <strong>of</strong> extraordinarily high risk that<br />

defendants knew was unlikely to generate pr<strong>of</strong>its or adequate returns going forward.<br />

(o) As a result <strong>of</strong> the foregoing, the forecasts for strong continued revenue and<br />

earnings growth for <strong>Enron</strong>'s WEOS and EES operations were completely false, in part, because the<br />

historical financial performance and condition <strong>of</strong> those operations had been materially falsified –<br />

thus there was no real basis upon which to forecast such further growth – and because neither <strong>of</strong><br />

those businesses had the current strengths or success to justify the forecasts and claims for future<br />

growth that were being made.<br />

- 157 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!