09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Enron</strong>'s other Offering Documents for securities <strong>of</strong>ferings during 00-01 incorporated the same<br />

disclosure with either the same prices indicated or lower prices.<br />

619. <strong>The</strong> purported disclosure was false and misleading because it misrepresented or<br />

concealed the nature, substance and effect <strong>of</strong> the "provisions for early settlement." First, if <strong>Enron</strong>'s<br />

stock price declined below the stated price levels, then <strong>Enron</strong> had to issue more shares – as it did in<br />

the Raptors – and the risk <strong>of</strong> this event was imminent. Second, the so-called disclosure concealed<br />

that in <strong>Enron</strong>'s bogus hedge transactions <strong>Enron</strong> bore the ultimate risk <strong>of</strong> the so-called hedges – <strong>Enron</strong><br />

was actually hedging with itself, not really hedging – and thus was multiplying, not reducing its<br />

risk. None <strong>of</strong> these matters were disclosed. <strong>The</strong> bankers and Vinson & Elkins knew the undisclosed<br />

facts – they were the ones that created the transactions containing the triggers. And it was well<br />

known by them that if <strong>Enron</strong>'s stock price hit those triggers it would decimate <strong>Enron</strong> because <strong>of</strong><br />

the quantity <strong>of</strong> shares that <strong>Enron</strong> would have to issue to bear the risk <strong>of</strong> the bogus hedges.<br />

620. Third, the Offering Documents failed to disclose that "early settlement" could grossly<br />

dilute <strong>Enron</strong>'s common stock as it did in the case <strong>of</strong> the bogus hedging transactions – "early<br />

settlement" was an imminent and highly negative risk. Fourth, the Offering Documents did not<br />

disclose that the triggers concerning LJM2/Raptors transactions were, in fact, massive credit support<br />

for <strong>Enron</strong>'s bogus hedging transactions. Fifth, the Offering Documents concealed the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

the credit support, which in the case <strong>of</strong> the LJM2/Raptors transactions alone amounted to over $2<br />

billion. And sixth, the range <strong>of</strong> the triggers was materially misrepresented as well: the<br />

LJM2/Raptors transactions ranged from $57.50 to as high as $83 per share, which would have<br />

signaled much higher risk if the true price range and nature, substance and effect <strong>of</strong> the triggers were<br />

disclosed. Moreover, the cost to <strong>Enron</strong> just to maintain the credit support represented by the<br />

undisclosed triggers was approximately $500 million as <strong>of</strong> 4/02/01.<br />

- 399 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!