09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

unable to locate an independent outside investor to quickly buy the 50% interest in JEDI, Barclays<br />

financed Chewco's purchase <strong>of</strong> the JEDI interest with debt, not equity. Thus, Chewco/JEDI was<br />

not a valid SPE meeting the requirements for non-consolidation. Notwithstanding, <strong>Enron</strong> did<br />

not consolidate Chewco/JEDI into <strong>Enron</strong>'s financial statements during 97-01 and used<br />

Chewco/JEDI to generate false pr<strong>of</strong>its from 97 through 01.<br />

23. In 99, <strong>Enron</strong>, Vinson & Elkins, Andersen and certain <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s bankers, created and<br />

then entered into numerous business transactions with two LJM partnerships which <strong>Enron</strong> and<br />

<strong>Enron</strong>'s CFO Fastow controlled. Over the next few years, defendants engaged in a series <strong>of</strong><br />

transactions – which were, in fact, manipulative devices – between <strong>Enron</strong> and the LJM<br />

partnerships and LJM SPEs which resulted in <strong>Enron</strong> inflating its reported financial results by<br />

more than a billion dollars – at the same time enriching Fastow and his friends and several <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Enron</strong>'s bankers who were allowed to invest in the LJM2 partnership – by tens <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong><br />

dollars. <strong>The</strong> reason for establishing these partnerships was that they would permit <strong>Enron</strong> to<br />

accomplish transactions it could not otherwise accomplish with an independent entity, by<br />

providing <strong>Enron</strong> with a buyer <strong>of</strong> assets that <strong>Enron</strong> wanted to sell. <strong>The</strong> LJM1 and LJM2<br />

transactions were structured, reviewed and approved by Andersen, Vinson & Elkins, the <strong>Enron</strong><br />

Defendants and certain <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s bankers, which also helped create and finance the LJM<br />

partnerships and these transactions.<br />

24. One <strong>of</strong> the primary manipulative devices used to falsify <strong>Enron</strong>'s financial results<br />

during the Class Period was LJM2, which was formed in 10/99 and secretly controlled by <strong>Enron</strong> and<br />

used to help create numerous SPEs (including the "Raptors") which defendants used to engage in<br />

transactions to artificially inflate <strong>Enron</strong>'s pr<strong>of</strong>its while concealing billions <strong>of</strong> dollars in debt that<br />

should have been included on <strong>Enron</strong>'s balance sheet. Defendants knew that because LJM2 was going<br />

- 19 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!