09.02.2013 Views

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

Enron Corp. - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• How <strong>Enron</strong> could, with its own capital stock, repeatedly add to the collateral<br />

underlying an obligation owed to <strong>Enron</strong> from a related party without recognizing it<br />

in the financial statements.<br />

• <strong>Enron</strong> stock contributions/issuances to LJM did not appear to be recorded on <strong>Enron</strong>'s<br />

books.<br />

• <strong>Enron</strong>'s financial statement disclosures related to the Fastow investment-company<br />

relationships and transactions were (putting it kindly) hard to understand or<br />

incomplete.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> LJM equity had been distributed to its shareholders, including Fastow and CIBC,<br />

concurrently, or shortly after, its original formation.<br />

934. Watkins informed Hecker that "she was concerned enough about these issues that she<br />

was going to discuss them with Ken Lay, <strong>Enron</strong>'s Chairman, on Wednesday, 8/22/01."<br />

G. Andersen Signed Off on <strong>Enron</strong>'s Phony Broadband<br />

Reporting and Mark-to-Market Accounting<br />

935. Andersen was consulted on, and reviewed, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enron</strong>'s manipulative transactions<br />

involving broadband as described in 520-532. Andersen signed <strong>of</strong>f on <strong>Enron</strong>'s mark-to-market<br />

accounting that the Company also used (and abused) for its broadband transactions.<br />

936. <strong>The</strong> improper accounting for the Braveheart/Blockbuster transactions, for example,<br />

was agreed to by Andersen. This egregious transaction, more fully described in 521-526, was<br />

responsible for most <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>Enron</strong> reported for broadband. Andersen actually signed <strong>of</strong>f on<br />

the phony recognition. As <strong>The</strong> New York Times noted on 1/30/02:<br />

<strong>Enron</strong> asserted that there was a market in broadband, and that its transaction<br />

amounted to one involving the transfer <strong>of</strong> financial assets. That meant it could report<br />

the transaction on a mark-to-market basis, similar to the way it accounted for the<br />

energy trades. It applied its undisclosed model to calculate how much revenue it<br />

could report from the transaction, and reported more than $110 million. Former<br />

executives say accountants at Arthur Andersen approved the accounting.<br />

"Nobody in the division could comprehend how they got Andersen to sign <strong>of</strong>f<br />

on that," one former senior executive in the broadband division said. "It just didn't<br />

make any sense. When we heard what they did, everybody's mouths just hung open.<br />

We weren't doing business on any scale even close to those numbers."<br />

- 598 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!