GUIAS HIPERTENSION ARTERIAL.indb - Scc
GUIAS HIPERTENSION ARTERIAL.indb - Scc
GUIAS HIPERTENSION ARTERIAL.indb - Scc
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Revista Colombiana de Cardiología<br />
Febrero 2007<br />
10. Triggle D. Mechanisms of Action of Calcium – Antagonists. In: Epstein M. Calcium<br />
Antagonists in Clinical Medicine. 3 a Edition. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus;<br />
2002.<br />
11. Abernethy DR. Pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic profile of mibefradil, a<br />
T- and L-type calcium channel antagonist. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 4C-11C.<br />
12. Weiner DA. Calcium channel blockers. Med Clin North Am 1988; 72: 83-115.<br />
13. Cohn JN, Ziesche S, Smith S, et al. Effect of the calcium antagonist felodipine as<br />
supplementary vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic heart failure treated<br />
with enalapril: V-HeFT III. Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial (V-HeFT) Study Group.<br />
Circulation 1997; 96: 856-863.<br />
14. O’Connor CM, Carson PE, Miller AB, et al. Effect of amlodipine on mode of death<br />
among patients with advanced heart failure in the PRAISE trial. Prospective Randomized<br />
Amlodipine Survival Evaluation. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 881-887.<br />
15. Packer M, O’Connor CM, Ghaliet JK, et al. Effect of amlodipine on morbidity<br />
and mortality in severe chronic heart failure. Prospective Randomized Amlodipine<br />
Survival Evaluation Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1107-1114.<br />
16. Thackray S, Witte K, Clark AL, Cleland JGF. Clinical trials update: OPTIME-CHF,<br />
PRAISE-2, ALLHAT. Eur J Heart Fail 2000; 2: 209-212.<br />
17. Opie LH. Calcium channel blockers in hypertension: reappraisal after new trials<br />
and major meta-analyses. Am J Hypertens 2001; 14: 1074-1081.<br />
18. Sica DA, Douglas JG. The African American Study of Kidney Disease and<br />
Hypertension (AASK): new findings. J Clin Hypertens 2001; 3: 244-251.<br />
19. Hansson L, Hedner T, Lund-Johansen P, et al. Randomised trial of effects of calcium<br />
antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular<br />
morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study.<br />
Lancet 2000; 356: 359-365.<br />
20. Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, et al. Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive<br />
drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity<br />
the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study. Lancet 1999; 354:<br />
1751-1756.<br />
21. Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients<br />
randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel<br />
blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a<br />
Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet 2000; 356: 366-372.<br />
22. Rosei EA, Dal Palu C, Leonetti G, et al. Clinical results of the Verapamil in<br />
Hypertension and Atherosclerosis Study. J Hypertens 1997; 15: 1337-1344.<br />
23. Borhani NO, Mercuri M, Borhani PA, et al. Final outcome results of the Multicenter<br />
Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS): a randomized controlled trial.<br />
JAMA 1996; 276: 785-791.<br />
24. Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR, et al. The effect of nisoldipine as compared<br />
with enalapril on cardiovascular events in patients with non-insulin-dependent<br />
diabetes and hypertension. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 645-652.<br />
25. National Intervention Cooperative Study in Elderly Hypertensives Study Group,<br />
Randomized double-blind comparison of a calcium antagonist and a diuretic<br />
in elderly hypertensives. Hypertension 1999; 34: 1129-1133.<br />
26. Tatti P, Pahor M, Byington RP, et al. Outcome results of the Fosinopril versus<br />
Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events randomized Trial in patients with hypertension<br />
and NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 597-603.<br />
27. Casiglia E, Spolaore P, Mazz A, et al. Effect of two different therapeutic approaches<br />
on total and cardiovascular mortality in a Cardiovascular Study in the Elderly<br />
(CASTEL). Jpn Heart J 1994; 35: 589-600.<br />
28. Abascal VM, Larson MG, Evans JC, et al. Calcium antagonists and mortality<br />
risk in men and women with hypertension in the Framingham Heart Study. Arch<br />
Intern Med 1998; 158: 1882-1886.<br />
29. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of<br />
placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension.<br />
The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet 1997;<br />
350: 757-764.<br />
30. Epstein M. Calcium antagonists should continue to be used for first-line treatment<br />
of hypertension. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 2150-2156.<br />
31. Epstein M. Calcium antagonists: still appropriate as first line antihypertensive<br />
agents. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 110-121.<br />
32. Salvetti A, Ghiadoni L. Guidelines for antihypertensive treatment: an update<br />
after ALLHAT study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: S51-S54.<br />
33. Epstein M. The calcium antagonist controversy: the emerging importance of<br />
drug formulation as a determinant of risk. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 9-19.<br />
Vol. 13 Suplemento 1<br />
ISSN 0120-5633<br />
231<br />
34. Materson BJ, Reda DJ, Cushman WC, et al. Single-drug therapy for hypertension<br />
in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. The Department<br />
of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.<br />
N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 914-921.<br />
35. Frishman WH, Brobyn R, Brown RD, et al. Amlodipine versus atenolol in essential<br />
hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 50A-54A.<br />
36. Yeghiazarians Y, Braunstein JB, Askari A, Stone PH. Unstable angina pectoris.<br />
N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 101-114.<br />
37. Frishman WH, Michaelson MD. Use of calcium antagonists in patients with ischemic<br />
heart disease and systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 33-38.<br />
38. Pine MB, Citron PD, Bailly DJ, et al. Verapamil versus placebo in relieving stable<br />
angina pectoris. Circulation 1982; 65: 17-22.<br />
39. Schrier RW, Estacio RO. Additional follow-up from the ABCD trial in patients with<br />
type 2 diabetes and hypertension. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1969-1973.<br />
40. Lindholm LH, Hansson L, Ekbom T, et al. Comparison of antihypertensive treatments<br />
in preventing cardiovascular events in elderly diabetic patients: results from the<br />
Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2. STOP Hypertension-2 Study<br />
Group. J Hypertens 2000; 18: 1671-1675.<br />
41. Sareli P, Radevski IV, Valtchanova ZP, et al. Efficacy of different drug classes used<br />
to initiate antihypertensive treatment in black subjects: results of a randomized<br />
trial in Johannesburg, South Africa. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 965-971.<br />
42. Bakris GL, Weir MR, DeQuattro V, McMahon FG. Effects of an ACE inhibitor/<br />
calcium antagonist combination on proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney<br />
Int 1998; 54: 1283-1289.<br />
43. Smolensky MH, Portaluppi F. Chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of<br />
cardiovascular medications: relevance to prevention and treatment of coronary<br />
heart disease. Am Heart J 1999; 137 (suppl): S14-S24.<br />
44. White WB, Anders RJ, MacIntyre JM, et al. Nocturnal dosing of a novel delivery<br />
system of verapamil for systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 375-380.<br />
45. Neutel JM, Alderman M, Anders RJ, Weber MA. Novel delivery system for verapamil<br />
designed to achieve maximal blood pressure control during the early<br />
morning. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 1202-1206.<br />
46. Lubsen J, Wagener G, Kirwan BA, de Brouwer S, Poole-Wilson PA. ACTION (A<br />
Coronary disease Trial Investigating Outcome with Nifedipine GITS) investigators.<br />
Effect of long acting nifedipine on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in<br />
patients with symptomatic stable engina and hypertension: the ACTION trial. J<br />
Hypertens 2005; 23: 641-648.<br />
47. Fagard R. Benefits and safety of long-acting calcium antagonists in coronary<br />
artery disease: the ACTION trial. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 489-491.<br />
48. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Hypertension: management<br />
of hypertension in adults in primary care: partial update. London: Royal<br />
College of Physicians; 2006.<br />
49. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of<br />
placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension<br />
(Syst-Eur). Lancet 1997; 350: 757-764.<br />
50. Wang JG, Staessen JA, Gong L, Liu L. Chinese trial on isolated systolic hypertension<br />
in the elderly. Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) Collaborative<br />
Group. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 211-220.<br />
51. Lubsen J, Wagener G, Kirwan BA, de Brouwer S, Poole-Wilson PA. ACTION (A<br />
Coronary disease Trial Investigating Outcome with Nifedipine GITS) investigators.<br />
Effect of long acting nifedipine on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity<br />
in patients with symptomatic stable engina and hypertension: the ACTION trial.<br />
J Hypertens 2005; 23: 641-648.<br />
52. Fagard R. Benefits and safety of long-acting calcium antagonists in coronary<br />
artery disease: the ACTION trial. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 489-491.<br />
53. ASCOT<br />
54. Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L, et al. Cardiovascular protection and blood<br />
pressure reduction: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2001; 358: 1305-1315.<br />
55. Turnbull F, for the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists´ Collaboration.<br />
Effects of different blood-pressure lowering regimens on major cardiovascular<br />
events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet<br />
2003; 362: 1527-1535.<br />
56. Padwal R, Laupacis A. Antihypertensive therapy and incidence of type 2 diabetes:<br />
a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 247-255.<br />
57. Mancia G, Gras G, Zanchetti A. New-onset diabetes and antihypertensive drugs.<br />
J Hypertens 2006; 24: 3-10.