Assistance au calage de modèles numériques en hydraulique ... - TEL

BIBLIOGRAPHIEFASKEN, G. B. (1963), Guide for selecting roughness coefficient "n" for channels. Rap. tech.,US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Lincoln, Nebraska. 55, 57, 69FAURE, J.-B. (2004), Choix de la modélisation. Dans : Guide méthodologique pour le pilotage desétudes hydrauliques, chap. 5, Version 1.1, CETMEF, Compiègne, France. 27FAURE, J.-B., DHERVILLEZ, L. et VIDAL, J.-P. (2002), Automatic evaluation of the uncertaintyon the surface of a flooded area. Dans : Hydroinformatics 2002 – Proceedings of the 5th InternationalConference on Hydroinformatics (I. D. Clukie, D. Han, J. P. Davis et S. Heslop,éds.), vol. 2: Software Tools and Management Systems, p. 1319–1324, IWA, Cardiff, U.K.43, 195FAWCETT, K. R., ANDERSON, M. G., BATES, P. D., JORDAN, J.-P. et BATHURST, J. C. (1995), Theimportance of internal validation in the assessment of physically based distributed models.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 20, p. 248–265. 44FINDLER, N. V. et MAZUR, N. M. (1989), System for automatic model verification and validation.Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation, vol. 6, n o 3, p. 153–172. 123FISHER, K. R. et DAWSON, H. (2003), Reducing Uncertainty in River Flood Conveyance –Roughness review. Rap. tech., DEFRA / Environment Agency, Project W5A – 57. 52, 56,57, 58FLAMANT, A. (1900), Hydraulique. Encyclopédie des Travaux Publics, Béranger, C., 2 e éd. 261FLAVELLE, P. (1992), A quantitative measure of model validation and its potential use for regulatorypurposes. Advances in Water Resources, vol. 15, n o 1, p. 5–13. 6FOSSET, C. A., HARRISON, D., WEINTROB, H. et GASS, S. I. (1991), An assessment procedurefor simulation models: A case study. Operations Research, vol. 39, n o 5, p. 710–723. 11FOUCAULT, M. (1990), Les mots et les choses – Une archéologie des sciences humaines, vol. 166 deCollection Tel. Gallimard, Paris, France. 83FOURNIÉ, V. (1867), Résumé des expériences hydrauliques exécutées par le gouvernement américainsur le Mississipi, avec remarques sur les conséquences qui en découlent relativement à la théoriedes eaux courantes. Dunod, Paris, France. 255FREAD, D. L. (1993), Flow routing. Dans : Handbook of Hydrology (D. R. Maidment, éd.),chap. 10, McGraw-Hill. 43FREAD, D. L. et LEWIS, J. M. (1998), NWS FLDWAV model. Thoretical description and user documentation,Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service.43FREAD, D. L. et SMITH, G. F. (1978), Calibration technique for 1-D unsteady flow models.Journal of the Hydraulics Division, vol. 104, n o 7, p. 1027–1044. 74FREEMAN, G. E., COPELAND, R. R. et COWAN, W. L. (1996), Uncertainty in stage-dischargerelationships. Dans : Stochastic Hydraulics’96 – Proceedings 7th IAHR Symposium on StochasticHydraulics (K. S. Tickle, C. Goulter, C. Xu, S. A. Wasimi et F. Bouchart, éds.), p. 601–608,International Association for Hydraulic Research. 194FRENCH, R. H. (1994), Open-Channel Hydraulics. Civil Engineering Series, Mc Graw-Hill InternationalEditions, 2 e éd. 52, 55, 59FRIDMAN NOY, N., FERGERSON, R. W. et MUSEN, M. A. (2000), The knowledge model ofProtégé-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. Dans : Proceedings of the second InternationalConference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2000)(R. Dieng et O. Corby, éds.), vol. 1937 de Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p. 17–32,Springer, Juan-les-Pins, France. 96FRIEDMAN, R., ANSELL, C., DIAMOND, S. et HAIMES, Y. Y. (1984), The use of models for waterresources management, planning, and policy. Water Resources Research, vol. 20, n o 7, p. 793–802. 20GATES, T. K., WATSON, C. C. et WITTLER, R. J. (1998), How spacing of cross-section surveysaffects understanding of variability in channel hydraulic geometry. Dans : Water Resources Engineering98 – Proceedings of the International Water Resources Engineering Conference (S. R.Abt, J. Young-Pezeshk et C. C. Watson, éds.), vol. 2, p. 1703–1708, ASCE, Memphis, Tenessee.43212