07.01.2013 Views

--KAPAK ARAÞTIRMA kopya 1 - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

--KAPAK ARAÞTIRMA kopya 1 - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

--KAPAK ARAÞTIRMA kopya 1 - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oth on the top of these and at their feet, whilst no associated stratification has been<br />

preser<strong>ve</strong>d. In most cases these are single phased occupations, as in some sites belonging<br />

to the Early Bronze Age II (Taş Tepe, n.14; Küçük Karamildan Tepe, n. 17) or<br />

to the Roman period (Fırıncı Köyü kuzeyi, n. 19; Aladdin Tepe, n. 28), or they represent<br />

reoccupations after <strong>ve</strong>ry long periods of abandonment (Kale Tepe, n. 30; Kurik, n.<br />

22; Muhlisin Tepe, n. 16; Karababa mevkii, n. 10). 3 sites are located on plateaus that<br />

ha<strong>ve</strong> <strong>ve</strong>ry steep slopes. These are areas in which the morphology clearly indicates an<br />

evident role of the site as controlling post o<strong>ve</strong>r the surrounding lands. Karamildan Tepe,<br />

located along the Malatya-Elazığ road, is a site of this kind (Figs. 7, 8). The majority<br />

of the materials found on the top of this site are of Roman period and amongst these<br />

is a coin possibly originating from the mint of Antiocheia and attributable to the Emperor<br />

Aurelianus (274-275 A.D.; IMP C AVRELIANVS AVG. "Imperator Caesar Aurelianus<br />

Augustus"; CONSERVAT AVG "Conservator Augusti"). The summit of the plateau<br />

is topographically divided in two distinct areas: one intended for a fortified occupation,<br />

surrounded by walls now partly submerged and partly visible; the other was outside<br />

the fortified area, and here are various cisterns and stone quarries from which building<br />

material was taken. Access to Karamildan from the valley can be identified by<br />

analysing the trans<strong>ve</strong>rsal photos. The morphology of the plateau re<strong>ve</strong>als, in fact, on its<br />

northern side, the only possible access, probably artificially modified, with a sinuous<br />

trend. From the base of the plateau Early Bronze Age materials ha<strong>ve</strong> been found.<br />

Two sites, with ceramics dated to various periods, ha<strong>ve</strong> been identified in hilly<br />

areas, with a wavy morphology, difficult to associate to any specific territorial category<br />

(Mağaracık, n. 3; Sarılık Tepe n. 11).<br />

Fi<strong>ve</strong> sites are on the plain and, except in one single case, (Palabıyıklar, n. 13),<br />

all are of Roman and Medieval period (Karabdal, n. 26; Başpınar, n. 23; Kayserci Pınar,<br />

n. 2; Mağaracık çevresi n. 5).<br />

Lastly, 4 are real höyüks: Fırıncı Höyük, n. 18; Yarım Tepe, n. 33; Cantepe, n. 24<br />

(or Cano Tepe); Süleyman Tepe, n. 27 (or Hasıcılar). These are sites already known of,<br />

which ha<strong>ve</strong> been subject to surface collections in the 50s and 70s by English, Israeli<br />

and Turkish teams of archaeologists. In<strong>ve</strong>stigations carried out by our equipe had the<br />

intent of identifying specific areas of distribution of the archaeological material on the<br />

single höyüks, and of updating the actual chronological distribution of the sites. Topographical<br />

plans with the differential GPS ha<strong>ve</strong> been made on 3 of the 4 tells. Amongst<br />

these is Süleyman Tepe (Hasıcılar, n. 27). This höyük (Figs. 9, 10), that embraces the<br />

whole Early Bronze III period (second half of the III millennium BC), evidences serious<br />

problems of conservation: the repeated and systematic removal of clay and gra<strong>ve</strong>l,<br />

used for building activities, has dramatically reduced the mound. The tell has grown on<br />

a natural hilly formation of gra<strong>ve</strong>ly and not well cemented conglomerate. Significant ceramic<br />

material has been collected from the contact surface between the geological formation<br />

and the archaeological le<strong>ve</strong>l. This would mean that the earliest occupation of<br />

this höyük can be dated with sufficient confidence to the beginning of Early Bronze III.<br />

Specific finds, not interpretable as occupation areas are those of 3 sites, unfortunately<br />

not dateable due to the total absence of ceramic materials. First case is that<br />

of Şahnalık Tepe (n. 29), an artificial earth tumulus at the margins of a vast plateau that<br />

o<strong>ve</strong>rlooks large part of the valley towards Malatya. The structure is greatly damaged<br />

due to the systematic removal of soil by the local villagers. No dating elements ha<strong>ve</strong><br />

been found, but the morphological characters <strong>ve</strong>ry much remind a "Kurgan". The second<br />

site is Laupbaba Tepe (n. 31). This is on the top of a mountain (Fig. 11), at 1200<br />

m. abo<strong>ve</strong> sea le<strong>ve</strong>l, and the identified structure is a large stone circle with a dromos<br />

access at the highest point of the circle; here too dating elements are absent. Lastly,<br />

at Taşlık Tepe (n. 32), a vast quarry, used until quite recently but today abandoned, has<br />

emerged. A specific area of the quarry would appear to ha<strong>ve</strong> been used in ancient times,<br />

e<strong>ve</strong>n though it is impossible to say when.<br />

Conclusions<br />

327

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!