07.01.2013 Views

--KAPAK ARAÞTIRMA kopya 1 - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

--KAPAK ARAÞTIRMA kopya 1 - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

--KAPAK ARAÞTIRMA kopya 1 - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In<strong>ve</strong>stigations on this portion of land are not yet concluded and we expect to increase<br />

the co<strong>ve</strong>rage in this coming campaign.<br />

One of the most significant results of the 2003 campaign, e<strong>ve</strong>n though still preliminary,<br />

is that of the identification of numerous sites with an occupation limited to<br />

single specific chronological phases. These are sites of Early Bronze II (2750-2500<br />

BC), that, as testified by excavations at Arslantepe VIC and Gelinciktepe 6, might explain<br />

this short and seasonal occupation with a transhumant kind of economy. The other<br />

case of single phase and small size sites are those of Roman period, probably with<br />

essentially military function.<br />

Real höyüks are few in this area. It is possible that this kind of settlement was<br />

mostly found along the Euphrates ri<strong>ve</strong>r, as demonstrated by the numerous excavations<br />

and sur<strong>ve</strong>ys carried out within the Keban project, whilst the hinterland had a different<br />

kind of settlement organisation.<br />

Until now, no traces of material dated to the Late Uruk period, corresponding to<br />

Arslantepe VIA, ha<strong>ve</strong> been found. This site is in fact the only settlement of the region<br />

for this period. With the first half of the III millennium BC seasonal and short li<strong>ve</strong>d sites<br />

appear to de<strong>ve</strong>lop, testifying a certain degree of mobility of the population. During the<br />

Early Bronze Age III, instead, the life style appears to change, as demonstrated by the<br />

occupation of only a few key sites in the area. Tells like Süleyman Tepe and Fırıncı can<br />

possibly be the result of this phenomenon, that brought, towards the second half of the<br />

III millennium BC, to a major concentration of population and the consequent decrease<br />

in the number of sites.<br />

A particular find is that of a lithic industry amongst which a bifacial chopper, worked<br />

out of a nodule of ryholite, probably dated to the Upper Acheulian. This has been<br />

disco<strong>ve</strong>red at Kale Tepe (n. 30, Fig. 12), in an area of Neogenic limestone, where Early<br />

Bronze Age material has been found. If confirmed by further research, this would be<br />

one of the few examples of such old date in the area. Sites of the Lower Palaeolithic,<br />

in fact, are to be sought in the Karababa region, at Şehremuz Sırtı near Samsat and<br />

Bozova Değirmen Tepe.<br />

Post Iron Middle Early Geo-<br />

No Site Classical Classical Age -Late Bronze Chalcol. Paleolithic morphological<br />

Period Period Bronze<br />

Age<br />

Age Period Period category<br />

1Arslantepe<br />

(excavation) x x x x x x x Höyük<br />

2 Kayserci Pınar x x Flat area<br />

3 Mağaracık 1x x Wavy<br />

morphology<br />

4 Mağaracık 2 x x Highplateau<br />

5 Mağaracık 3 x x Flat area<br />

6 Mağara Tepe x Natural hill<br />

7 Alibaba Ziyareti x x Natural hill<br />

8 Karabağlar - Milli x Highplateau<br />

9 Karababa Ziyareti x Natural hill<br />

10 Karababa Mevkii x x x Natural hill<br />

6 Palmieri A., "Insediamento del Bronzo Antico a Gelinciktepe (Malatya)", Origini, I, 1967: 117-193.<br />

328

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!