30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LitigaticlZ. 187<br />

whilst others despised it. St. Paul, thongl1 no one<br />

inculcated forgi\1eness and forbearance \\~ith a deepel·<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> the \'aIue and obii~g3.tion <strong>of</strong> these \~irtue~, ,<br />

did not interpret either <strong>of</strong> t~·iem to require an unresisting<br />

:;ubmission to every (rjntumelv~ or a neglect<br />

l ~ J ~<br />

t.1f ti1e means <strong>of</strong> safety and self-defence. He took<br />

.J<br />

~·efuge ill the laws <strong>of</strong> his CQUIltry, and in the privileges<br />

ot' a RfJilJt1n citizen, from the conspiracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

.. feu}s, (Acts xxv. 11.) and from the clandestine vi ...<br />

oIencc <strong>of</strong> the chief captain. (Acts xxii~ 25.) And<br />

yet this is the same Apostle who reproved the litigiousness<br />

(If his COrilJthilllZ converts \vith so much<br />

severity. "Now, therefore, there is utterly a fault<br />

a~ong you, because ye go to la\v one \vith ancther ;<br />

why do ye not rather take wrong? why do ye not:<br />

rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded ?"<br />

()n l;je one hand, therefore, Christianity excludes<br />

ail \'indictive motives, and all frivolous causes <strong>of</strong><br />

prosecution; ~o that where the injury is snlall, \vhere<br />

110 good purpose <strong>of</strong> public example is ans\\7ered, whel-e<br />

farbearance is not likely to in\1ite a repetition <strong>of</strong>8 the<br />

injury, or where the expense <strong>of</strong> an action becomes a<br />

punishment too se\~ere for the <strong>of</strong>ieI1Ce;" there the<br />

Christian is withholden bv the authority <strong>of</strong> his relj{T·<br />

· f · I J 0<br />

Oln rom gC)lng to a\\r.<br />

On the other 11and, a la\v-suit is inconsistent \,7itl1<br />

no rule <strong>of</strong> the Gospel, \vhen it is instituted,<br />

1. For the e.;tabiishing <strong>of</strong> some important right.<br />

2. For the procuring a compensation for ~onlC:<br />

t:unsiderable da1l12ge.<br />

3. For the preventing <strong>of</strong> future injury.<br />

But since it is supoosed to be undertaken sinlo})'<br />

i ~<br />

with a view to the ends <strong>of</strong> justice and safety, the pro:.-<br />

ecutor <strong>of</strong> the action is b()und to cOIlfinc rJinl~el[ t()<br />

the cheapest process which will accompli~h these c!Hls,<br />

as well as to consent tp any pc~ceabll' expedient for<br />

the same purpose; as to a rcjerence, in which the ar·<br />

bitrators can do, what the law cannot, divide t11e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!