30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

·"reai.~r inconn~ni~n~v than that <strong>of</strong> erecting the prac.<br />

~ - -<br />

tice <strong>of</strong> tl1c ),1-. 1 ; jIltO a ~eparate protession: \\·hich this<br />

r('a~on, \\-e alio\\-, Il1akes n(;.ces~ary ; fur if we: attribute<br />

~:o much authority to precerlent.~, it is expedient<br />

that thc\' be kno\r;n in e';en' cau~!:, both to the ad~'o-<br />

~ J<br />

~:atC$ .md to the judge: this YJlowledge cannot be<br />

general, since if i~ the fi-uit <strong>of</strong>tt"ntimes <strong>of</strong> laborious<br />

n~scarch, or dem;{nds a memory ston:d with long­<br />

£oIIected erudirion.<br />

To a mind revolving upon the subject <strong>of</strong> human<br />

.!urisprudenct'~ ther·~ frequently occurs this qu~stion ;<br />

\\·h)~, since the fllaxilns <strong>of</strong> llatural ju~tice are few and<br />

c\·ideJlt, do there arise so nl~llly doubts and contro­<br />

\~ersies in their application ? O~, in other wOl·d~, how<br />

conIes it to pa~s, that, a!rhougll the prillciples <strong>of</strong> the<br />

law <strong>of</strong> nature be silnpie, and for the most p:lrt sufficiently<br />

obvious, there s}10uld exist ne\?"errheless, in<br />

every system <strong>of</strong> municipal laws, and in the actual adtninbtration<br />

<strong>of</strong> relative justice, numerous uncertain­<br />

I<br />

ties and acknowledged difficulty? \Vhence, it· may<br />

be asked, Sf! much reonl for litif!ation, aIld ~o many<br />

~~ J<br />

subsi:;ting dispute~, if the ruies <strong>of</strong> humanl duty be<br />

neither obscure nor dubiou~ ? If a sy~tem <strong>of</strong> morality,<br />

contailling both tfle prCcfpts <strong>of</strong> rC\1elalion, and rhe<br />

deduction~ <strong>of</strong>- reaSt)n - Jl1aV t e cO:1Jprised within the<br />

; ~<br />

compass <strong>of</strong> Of!::: rll0df~rate \901u!ne; and the moralist<br />

be able, as i1e pretend~, to describe tht~ rights alld ob ..<br />

ligations <strong>of</strong> mankind, in all the different relations<br />

they Inay hold to one another, '\\:I1Llt ne~d <strong>of</strong> those<br />

codtS <strong>of</strong> po~itive and. particular institutions, <strong>of</strong> those<br />

tomes <strong>of</strong> statutes alld reports, \\/hicIl require the enlploym.~nt<br />

<strong>of</strong> a long life eVen to peruse? Alld trlis<br />

question is immediately connected with the argument<br />

which has bee:! discussed in the preceding paragraph ;<br />

for unless there be found some greater uncertainty in<br />

the law <strong>of</strong> nature, or what may be called natural equi.<br />

t y ~ w hen it com~~ to be applied to real cases and to<br />

actual adj':1dication, than what appears in the rules<br />

and principles <strong>of</strong> the scieIlce, as delivered in the wri ..<br />

~in.'js <strong>of</strong> those who treat <strong>of</strong> the subject, it were better

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!