30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Of Crimes and Punisbmccts. 413<br />

speeific pro<strong>of</strong>. The statute which made the po&.Session<br />

<strong>of</strong> the impiements <strong>of</strong> coining capital~ that is, which<br />

constituted that possession complete evidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fender)s guilt, was the first thing ~lla~ gave force<br />

and efficacy to the denunciations <strong>of</strong> I~L upon this.<br />

subject. The statute <strong>of</strong> JAM £s the Fir. i, relative to \<br />

the mur~er <strong>of</strong> bastard ch~dren, whict· ordains that i<br />

-" - J<br />

the ~ con~e"lment <strong>of</strong> the birth should be deemed incon.,<br />

testable pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the charge, though a harsh law, wa(<br />

in like manner with the fOl"lI\er, well calcu:ated t,I><br />

put a stOD to the crime. ..<br />

It is uPon the principle <strong>of</strong> this observation, that!'<br />

apprehend much harm to have been done to the I<br />

community, by the overstrained scrupulousness, or j<br />

weak timidity <strong>of</strong> juries, which demands <strong>of</strong>ten such!<br />

'pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a prisoner's guilt, as the nature and secrecf<br />

<strong>of</strong> his crime scarce possibly admit <strong>of</strong> ;. and whi~<br />

holds it the part <strong>of</strong> a safe conscience ~ot to conde~<br />

any man, whilst there exists the minutest possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> his innocence.<br />

Any story they may happen to<br />

have heard or read, whether real or feigned, in which<br />

courts <strong>of</strong> justice have been tnisled by presumptions<br />

<strong>of</strong> guilt, is enough, in their minds, to found an ac­<br />

~uittal UpOD, where positive pr~<strong>of</strong> i;-; wanting. I<br />

ao not mean that juries should indulge conjectures,<br />

should magnify suspicions into pro<strong>of</strong>s, or even that<br />

they should weigh probabilities in gold scalfs; but<br />

when the preponderation <strong>of</strong> evidence is so manifest,<br />

as to persuade every private understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prisoner's guit; when it furnishes that degree <strong>of</strong><br />

credibility, upon whicll nleo- decide and a~t in all<br />

other doubts, and which exp~rience huth shown that<br />

they may decide and act upon with sufficient safety:<br />

to reject such pro<strong>of</strong>, froIn an insinuation <strong>of</strong> nncer·<br />

rainty that belongs to all human affair.s, and from a<br />

~cneral dread lest the charge <strong>of</strong> iJl110ce11t blood sIlouJd<br />

lie at their doors, is a conduct which, 110\VC\"cr natural<br />

to ,} Illil1l1 studiollS to its 0\\111 qtliet, is allthorizeli<br />

hy no consid"ration~ <strong>of</strong> rectitude or utility. It coun·<br />

teract~ the carc, and damps the activity <strong>of</strong> governmE'llt:<br />

it holds out public e:nconragement to villany,<br />

by c(.'.nft>.:~~.il1g the il.npq~s~hiJiry cf hriJJgjng viilai,n~ to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!