30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

216 Of Divorce.<br />

leased from their subsisting engagements. Suppose<br />

the husband to have once preferred his wife to all<br />

other women, the duration <strong>of</strong>e this p:eference cannot<br />

be trusted to. Possession makes t! great difference:<br />

and there is no other security · against the invitations<br />

<strong>of</strong> novelty, than the known impossibility <strong>of</strong> obtaining<br />

the object. Did the cause, which brings the<br />

sexes together, hold them together by the same force<br />

with which it first attract~d them to each other, or<br />

could the woman t~ restored to her personal integrity,<br />

and to all the advantclges <strong>of</strong> her virgin estate;<br />

the power <strong>of</strong> divorce might be deposited in the<br />

hands <strong>of</strong> the husband, with less danger <strong>of</strong> abuse or<br />

inconveniency. But constituted as mankind are,<br />

and injured as the repudiated \life generally must<br />

be, it is necessary to add a stability to the condition<br />

<strong>of</strong> married women, more secure than the continuance<br />

<strong>of</strong> their husband's affection; and to supply to<br />

!,«th sides, by a sense <strong>of</strong> duty and obligation, what<br />

satiety has impaired <strong>of</strong> pas"ion and <strong>of</strong> per"onal at ..<br />

tachment. Upon the whole, the power <strong>of</strong> divorce<br />

is evidently and greatly to the disadvantage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

\VOmal1; and thf;! only question appears to be, whether<br />

the real and pernlanent happiness <strong>of</strong> oue half <strong>of</strong><br />

the species should be surrendered to the cclprice and<br />

vO!.Jotuousness <strong>of</strong> the other?<br />

\V e have c'onsidered divorces as depending upDn<br />

the will <strong>of</strong> the husband, becau[\e that j~<br />

the way in<br />

\vh::ch they have actually obtained in many parts <strong>of</strong><br />

th:? world: but the same objections apply, in a great<br />

dec~ree, to divorce~ by mutual consellt; especially<br />

wIlen we consider the indelicate situation, and small<br />

pro~pect <strong>of</strong> happiness, which remains to the party,<br />

"Nl1o oppo,ed his or her dissent to the liberty and<br />

desire <strong>of</strong> the other.<br />

rl'lle law <strong>of</strong> J1aturc a(itnit~ ()f· an e:~ception in fa-,<br />

vour <strong>of</strong> the injured part:', in ca.~es<br />

<strong>of</strong> adultery, <strong>of</strong><br />

ob~tinate deserti()n, <strong>of</strong> ,ltten1pt~ 111)on life, ,<strong>of</strong> otltrageous<br />

cruelty, <strong>of</strong> incurable madness. aud, perhaps,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!