30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

itS stated in the Scripture&\. ~~::~<br />

iJy force; nor can we judge wh:t r;~ply the Apostles<br />

~Nould have made to this sel,'ond que~tion, if it had<br />

been proposed to them, from any thing they have<br />

delivered upon the first; any more than in the two<br />

consultations abo\'e de~cribed, it could be kI10~!ln beforehand,<br />

what I would ~ay in the latter, from the<br />

answer which I gave to the former.<br />

The only defect in this account is, that neither the<br />

scriptures, nor any ~;ubs fquent history <strong>of</strong> the early<br />

ages <strong>of</strong> the church, furni;\h any direct attestation <strong>of</strong><br />

the existence <strong>of</strong> such disaffected sentiments amongst<br />

the primitive converts. TheV supply indeed some<br />

circumstances, which render probable the opinion,,­<br />

that.extravagant notions <strong>of</strong> th ... political rights <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chri~tian state were at that tjm~ entertained by tnany<br />

proselytes to the religion. From the question proposed<br />

to Christ, "Is it lawful to give tribute unto<br />

Cresar ?" it may be presumed that doubts had been<br />

started in the Je\vish schools concerning the obliga ..<br />

tion, or even the lawfulness, <strong>of</strong> submission to the Ro­<br />

Inan yoke. The accounts delivered by Josephus, <strong>of</strong><br />

various insurrectiollS <strong>of</strong> the Jews <strong>of</strong> that and the following<br />

age, excited by this principle, or upon this<br />

pretence, confirm the presumption. Now, as the<br />

Christians \vere at first chiefly taken from the Jews~.<br />

confounded ,vith them by the rest <strong>of</strong> the world, and,<br />

from the affinity <strong>of</strong> the t\VO religions~ apt to intermix<br />

the doctrines <strong>of</strong> both, it is not t~ be wondered<br />

at, that a tenet, so flatteIing to the self.importance <strong>of</strong><br />

tl10se wIlo embraced it, should have been con1ffiuni.<br />

cated to the new institution. Again, the teacllers <strong>of</strong>'<br />

Cllristianit y, am{)ngst the pri\rileges \\~ hich their religion<br />

cOllfcrred upon its pr<strong>of</strong>essors, \~~ere wont to<br />

extol the" liberty into which they were callcd"-" in<br />

which Christ had m~de them free." This liberty,<br />

whic.h \vas intended <strong>of</strong> a delivet ance from the various<br />

servitude, in which they had llcret<strong>of</strong>()re lived<br />

to the domination <strong>of</strong> sinful passions, to the superstition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Genti~e idolatry, Qr the incumbered ritu.<br />

al <strong>of</strong> the Jewish dispensation, might by some be in·<br />

tcrpreted to signify an emancipation from all rt"'.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!