30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

318 Duty <strong>of</strong> Submission explained.<br />

gation~ a plletis, the original convention is appeaoled<br />

to anJ trl.'ateQ <strong>of</strong> as a reality. ':Vhenever the dis.<br />

ciplc~ <strong>of</strong> this system peak <strong>of</strong> the constitution; <strong>of</strong><br />

the fun(Jamental article~ <strong>of</strong> the constitution; <strong>of</strong> laws<br />

bci!lg cO~1stitutionaI or unconstitutional; <strong>of</strong> inherent,<br />

unalienable, inexringuishable right~, either in<br />

the prince, or in the people; or indeed <strong>of</strong> any laws,<br />

usages, or civil right-·~ as transcending the authority<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subsi.)ting legi~lafure, or possessing a force and<br />

sanction superior to \vhat belong to the modem<br />

acts and edicts <strong>of</strong> the legislature, they secretly refer<br />

us to what passed at the original convention. They<br />

would teach us to believe that c(rcain rules and ordinances<br />

were established by the people, at the same<br />

time that they settled the charter <strong>of</strong> government,<br />

and the powers as well as the form <strong>of</strong> the future Ie.<br />

gislature ; that this legi"Iature consequently, deriving<br />

its commission and existence from the consent and<br />

act <strong>of</strong> the ~rimitive assembly (<strong>of</strong> wl1ich· indeed it is<br />

only the standing deputation) continues subject in<br />

the exercise <strong>of</strong> its <strong>of</strong>fices, and as to the extent <strong>of</strong> itspower,<br />

to the ru!es, reservations, and limitations<br />

which the same ~ssembly then made and prescribed<br />

•<br />

to It.<br />

" As the first members <strong>of</strong> the stat~ \vere bound bv<br />

express stipulation to obey the government which<br />

they h~d erected, so the suceeding inhabitants <strong>of</strong><br />

the saIl1e country are understood to promise allegi,,­<br />

ance to the constitutioll and government tiley find<br />

established, by acce, ting its protectioll, claiming its<br />

pri,rileges, and acquiescillg in its laws; more espec ...<br />

ially, by the purchase or inheritance <strong>of</strong> lands, to<br />

the possession <strong>of</strong> which, allegiance to the state is an~<br />

nexed, as the very service and condition <strong>of</strong> the teu­<br />

\.ln~." Smoothly as this train <strong>of</strong> argument proceeds,<br />

little <strong>of</strong> it wiil endure examination. rrhe native sub ..<br />

iects <strong>of</strong> modern states are not conscious <strong>of</strong> any stipu ..<br />

htion \vith their sovereigns, <strong>of</strong> ever exercising an<br />

elt:ctit)!1 \,,911ctller tIley \\'ill l)e l)OUlld or not by tIle acts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the legislature, <strong>of</strong> allY alternative being proposed<br />

~'-J theIr ch()ice~ <strong>of</strong> a pl'omise either required or giv ..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!