30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Of Crimes and Punishments. 4:03<br />

their violence becomes more formidable~ the confed.<br />

erates more desperate, and the difficulty <strong>of</strong> defending<br />

the publ ic a~ainst their depredations much greater,<br />

than in the C3!'e <strong>of</strong> solitary adventurers. Which sev~<br />

eral comsiderations compose a distinction, that is properly<br />

adverted to, in deciding upon the fate <strong>of</strong> convicted<br />

malefactor~.<br />

In crimes, however, which are perpetrated by a 1<br />

Iouldtude, or by a gang, it is proper to ~eparate, in \<br />

the punishment, the ringleader from his followers, (<br />

the principal from his accomplices, and even the per ..<br />

son who struck the blow, br(lke the Jock, or first en- \<br />

tered the house, from those who joined him in the t<br />

felony; not so Inuch on account <strong>of</strong>" any distinc[io~<br />

in the guilt <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fenders, as for the sake <strong>of</strong> casting<br />

an obstacle in the way <strong>of</strong> such contederacies, by rendering<br />

it difficult for the confederates to settle who<br />

shall begin the attack, or to find a 111ar! amongst their<br />

D(lmber willing to expose himself to greater danger<br />

thal~ his a~sociates. 1"'11is is another instance in \\" hich<br />

the pi.lnishn1ent, \\1hich expediency directs, does not<br />

pursue the exact prOpOrrl(}ll <strong>of</strong> the cril11l·. .<br />

Injurie£: effect.ed by terror ~nd vi(jlence~ are t ho.~<br />

which it is the first and chief COllCern <strong>of</strong> lega.l gov.<br />

ernment to repress; because, t!leir ext(li1t is Ulllilllited;<br />

because, flO private precauti()n can protect tIl ~<br />

SUbjl·:.t againsi them; bec~use, they cr.danger life and<br />

safety, as we II as property; aha la:sti y, beca use they<br />

render the ~ondjti~n <strong>of</strong> .s~jciety<br />

<strong>of</strong> personal lllsecunt.y. I hese reasons do 1;0[ apply<br />

to frauds, w11ich circuGls~)ectio!l<br />

wrelched, by a sen~o/<br />

111ay prevent; V/llic)1<br />

mnst wait for opportunity; which can prccet:d only<br />

to certain Jilllits; and by the apprehell~ion <strong>of</strong>- \vhich,<br />

although the businf'ss <strong>of</strong> life be ir!commoded, life itself<br />

is not made miserable. rl he appe;lrance <strong>of</strong> this<br />

gjstinction has led sonle hunlane \\rrirers to express a<br />

!ish, that c2pital punishments might be confined to<br />

crimes <strong>of</strong> violence. .<br />

In estimating the cOlT'parative malignancy <strong>of</strong> crimes<br />

<strong>of</strong> violence, regard i~<br />

to be had, not only to the prop"<br />

er and intended mischief <strong>of</strong> the crinle, but to the<br />

fright ocg&ioned bI the attack, to t~e_~ener~l alar~ .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!