30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Soo<br />

Dilly <strong>of</strong> Submission explaIned.<br />

region <strong>of</strong> the world; does that vote, unaccompanied<br />

especially with any culture, inclosure, or proper act<br />

<strong>of</strong> occupation, make it theirs? does it entitle them<br />

to exclude others from it, or to dictate the conditions<br />

upon which it shall be enjoyed? Yet this original<br />

collective· right and ownership, is the foundation <strong>of</strong><br />

all the reasoning, by which the duty <strong>of</strong> allegiaI!ce is<br />

inferred from the possession <strong>of</strong> land.<br />

The theory <strong>of</strong> government, which affirms the existt7Dce<br />

and the obligation <strong>of</strong> a social compact, would,<br />

after all, m?rit little di~cussion, a.nd however :sround.<br />

less and unnecessary, should receive no oppo~itioa<br />

from US~ did it not apPe3l to lead to conclusions unfavourable<br />

to the improvement, and to the peace <strong>of</strong><br />

• •<br />

numan socIety.<br />

1st. Upon the supposition that government was<br />

first erected' by, and that it derives all its just authority<br />

from, rEsolutions entered into by a convention<br />

<strong>of</strong> the people, it is capable <strong>of</strong> being presumed~<br />

that many points were settled by that conv~ntion,<br />

aIlterior to the establishment <strong>of</strong> the subsisting legislature,<br />

and which the legislature, consequently, hasno<br />

right to alter, or interfere with. These points<br />

are called the fundamentals <strong>of</strong> the constitution; and<br />

as it is impossible to deternline how many, -or what<br />

they are, the sugge'ting <strong>of</strong> any ~uch, serves extremely<br />

to embarrass the deliberations <strong>of</strong> ttle legislature, and<br />

affords a dclngerous pretence ff)r di~puting tIle author ..<br />

ity <strong>of</strong> the laws. It was this 80rt <strong>of</strong> reasoning (~o far as<br />

reasoning <strong>of</strong> any kind was employed in the question)<br />

that produced in this nation the doubt, which so<br />

~uch agitated the minds <strong>of</strong> men in the reign <strong>of</strong> the<br />

second Charles, whether an Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament could<br />

<strong>of</strong> right alter or litnit the succession <strong>of</strong> the crown.<br />

2dly. If it be by virtue <strong>of</strong> a compact, that the subject<br />

owes obedience to civil government, it will fol~<br />

low, that he ought to abide by the form <strong>of</strong> government<br />

which he fllld~ e~tablished, be it ever r.o absurd,<br />

or inconvenient. . I-Ie is bOUJld b,~ his bargain. It is<br />

~<br />

not perlnltted to any man to retreat from his engagement.<br />

merely bccaw;e he finds the pC)'formancc di~ad.·

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!