30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Djtt'isi~n <strong>of</strong> Rights. 79<br />

him the judge <strong>of</strong> his own qualifications. You can·<br />

not do this, but you must make all other ~ndidates<br />

rhe same; which would open a door to demands<br />

without number, reason, or right. In like manner,<br />

a poor man has a right to relief from the rich; but<br />

the mode, ~eason! and quantum <strong>of</strong> that relief, who<br />

shall contribute to it, or how much, ru-e not ascer­<br />

Wned. Y et these points must be ascertained, before<br />

a claim to relief can be prosecuted by force. For<br />

[0 allow the poor to ascertdin them for themselves,<br />

would be to expose property to so many <strong>of</strong> these ·<br />

;.:laims, that it would lose its value, or cease indeed<br />

to be property. The same observation holds <strong>of</strong> all<br />

other cases <strong>of</strong> impe~ect rights; not to mention,<br />

that in the instances <strong>of</strong> gratitude, aft"ection, rever"<br />

ence, and the like, force is excluded by the very<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> the duty, which must be voluntary, or net<br />

at all~<br />

Where~r the ri~h~~~2erfect, th~ co~nd-_<br />

I am obliged to . prefer the<br />

i~,!ililigatiotUs so~.<br />

best candidate, to relieve the poor, be gratefnl to<br />

my benefactors, take care <strong>of</strong> my children, and reverence<br />

my parents; but in all these cases, my obliga-, J7"-- ,<br />

tion, like their right, is imperfect. /"", ' .. '<br />

I call these obligations "imperfect,~' in conf!>rm ..<br />

ity to the established language Of writers upon the<br />

subject. The term, however, seems ill chosen on<br />

this account, that it leads many to imagine, that<br />

there is less guilt in the violation <strong>of</strong> an imperfect<br />

obligation, than <strong>of</strong> a perfect one; which is a groundless<br />

notion. ~Q! an ob~tion .hein$ ~rf~ct?t:._~= ~<br />

perfect, d~ter~e_s. only . wh~ther V,10ren~~ Illay or_ ..<br />

may-not he, employed to enforce it ; and_det~nnines<br />

notliing else. The degree <strong>of</strong> guilt-ilK,.u-red by viC.'·'<br />

lating the obligation is a different thiD.g. It is determined<br />

by circumstances altoietb~r independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> this distinction. A man, who by a partial, prejudiced,<br />

or corrupt vote, disappoints a worthy candidate<br />

<strong>of</strong> a station in life, UpOJl which bis hopes, pos-<br />

I"

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!