30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ci'IJil Liberty. 399<br />

the exclusive right <strong>of</strong> the people to tax themselves by<br />

their own representatives; a sixth in the freedom<br />

and purity <strong>of</strong> elections <strong>of</strong> repre~entatives; a seventh<br />

in the control which the democratic part <strong>of</strong> the con·<br />

stitution possesses over the military establishment.<br />

Concerning which, and :ome other similar accounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> civil liberty, it may be observed, that they all labour<br />

under one inaccuu-cy, viz. that they de~cribe<br />

not so much liberty itself, as. the safe.guard~ and preservatives<br />

<strong>of</strong> liberty: for example, a man's being governed<br />

by no laws, but those to which he has g;ven<br />

hjs consent, were it practicable, is no otherwise necessary<br />

to the enjoyment <strong>of</strong> civil liberty, than as it<br />

affords a probable security against the dictation <strong>of</strong><br />

laws, imposing superfluous restrictions upon his private<br />

\\'ill. This remark is applicable to the restc<br />

The diversity <strong>of</strong> these definitions will not surprise us,<br />

when. we consider that there is no contrariety or op·<br />

position amongst them whatever ; for, by how many<br />

different provisions an4 precautions civil liberty is<br />

feni:ed and protected, so- many di~rent flccounts <strong>of</strong><br />

liberty itself, all sufficiently consiste~t with truth and<br />

with each other, ~Jy, accordirJg to this ~ode <strong>of</strong> explaining<br />

the term, be framed and adopted.<br />

Truth cannot be <strong>of</strong>fended by a definition, but propriety<br />

may. In which view those clefinitions <strong>of</strong> libretty<br />

ought to be rejected, which, by making tIlat essential<br />

to civil freedpm which is unattainable in experience!!<br />

inflame expectations that can never be gratified,<br />

and disturb the public content with complaints,<br />

which no wisdom or benevolence <strong>of</strong> government can<br />

remove. .<br />

It will not be thought extraordinary, that an idea,<br />

which occurs so much <strong>of</strong>tener as the subject <strong>of</strong> panegyric<br />

and careless declamation, than <strong>of</strong> just reasoning<br />

or correct knowledge, should be attended with<br />

uncertainty and confusion'; or that it ShOtlld be found<br />

impossible to contrive a definition, which may include<br />

the numerous, un~~ttled,<br />

and ever varying significations,<br />

which the term is made- to stand for, and at the<br />

same time accord with the condition and experience<br />

<strong>of</strong> sQciallife.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!