30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

190<br />

exert or withhold. Now not only the choice <strong>of</strong> the<br />

objec.ts, but the quantity and even the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

this sort <strong>of</strong> kindIless in the world, depends, ill a<br />

great measure, upon the return wIlier! it receives;<br />

and this is a consider~lti9n <strong>of</strong> general importance.<br />

A second reason for cultivating a grateful temper<br />

in ourselves is the following. The sanle principle,<br />

'"vhich is touched with tIle kindness <strong>of</strong> a human bene-<br />

\<br />

factor, is capable <strong>of</strong> being affected by the divine goodness,<br />

and <strong>of</strong> becoming, under the influence <strong>of</strong> that<br />

affectioll, a source <strong>of</strong> th,e purest and most exalted<br />

virtue. The love <strong>of</strong> Go.(i is the subiime. : gratitude.<br />

It is a mistake, therefore, to imagine that this virtue<br />

is omitted in the Christian s(ript_ures; for every<br />

pr~ccpt, \vhich conlmands us " to love God, because<br />

he first loved us," preStlpposes the principle <strong>of</strong> grati­<br />

{tide, and directs it to its proper object.<br />

It is ill1possible to particularize the several expressions<br />

<strong>of</strong>~ gratitude, in as llluch as they vary \\1ith the<br />

cl1aractcr and situation <strong>of</strong> tIle benefactor, and \vith<br />

the opportunities <strong>of</strong> the person obliged; \vhich variety<br />

admits <strong>of</strong> no bounds.<br />

It may be. observed, hO\\TeVer, that gratitude can<br />

ne\?cr oblige a nlan to do what is \vrong, and \vhat<br />

by consequence he is previousl)T obliged not to do.<br />

It is n,n ingratitude to refuse to do, \\"hat \\~e cannot<br />

!'ccoIJcile to any apprehensions <strong>of</strong> our duty; but it<br />

:is ingratitude and hypocrisy together, to pretend<br />

this reason, \\'hen it is Ilot the real 011e: and the fre ..<br />

quency <strong>of</strong> such pretences has brought this apology<br />

For non-compliance \vith the will <strong>of</strong> a benefactor into<br />

unnl~rited disgrace.<br />

It 11as long been accounted a violation <strong>of</strong> delicacy<br />

c-<br />

and generositY,to upbraid men with the favours thc~<br />

ha ve received; but it argues a total destitution ot<br />

both these qualities, as well as <strong>of</strong> moral probity, to<br />

take advantage <strong>of</strong> that a~cendency, which the conrc·rring<br />

0f benefits justly creates, to draw or drive<br />

those whom we have obliged into mean or dishoIlC:)t<br />

,;omplianccs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!