30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Drunkenne/J'. ~49<br />

tirunken revels <strong>of</strong>ten end; and also those deleteri.<br />

ous and maniacal effects, which strong liquors produce<br />

upon particular constitution.~ ; because, in general<br />

propositions concerning drunkenness, no consequences<br />

should be included, bu t what are constant<br />

enough to be generally expected.<br />

Drunkenness is repeatedly forbidden by St. Paul :<br />

c, Be not drunk \\,ith wine, wherein is excess."<br />

.u Let us walk honestly as in the day, not in rioting<br />

and d~jnkenness." "Be not deceived.: neither<br />

fornicators--nor dr1lnkardr, nor revilers., nor extor.<br />

tioners, shall inherit the kingdom ot God," Eph. v.<br />

18. Rom. xiii. 13. 1 Cor. vi. 9, 10. The same Apostle<br />

'Iikewise condemns dr,unkenness, as peculiarly inconsistent<br />

with the Christianprcfession : "They that be<br />

drunken, are drunken in thE night.; but iet us, who<br />

are <strong>of</strong> the day, be sober.J~ 1 Thes. v. 7, 8. We are not<br />

concerned with the argumerlt; the words amo.unt<br />

to a prohibition <strong>of</strong> drunkenness; and the authority<br />

is conclusive. . .<br />

It is a question <strong>of</strong> some importance, how far drunk.,<br />

enness is an excuse for the ~rilDes which the drunk •<br />

•<br />

en pelSOO commIts.<br />

In the solution <strong>of</strong> this question, we will first suppose<br />

the drunken person to be altogether deprived' <strong>of</strong><br />

maral agency, that is to say, <strong>of</strong> all refiection and foresight.<br />

In this condition, it is evident, that he is ne<br />

Dlore capable <strong>of</strong> guilt than a madman; although,<br />

like him, he may be extremely mischievous. The<br />

.only guiJt~ with which he is chargeable, was incurred<br />

at the time when he voluntarily brought himself in ..<br />

to this situation. And as every man is responsible<br />

for the consequences which he foresaw, or might<br />

have foreseen l and for no other, this guilt will be in<br />

proportion to the probability <strong>of</strong> such consequences<br />

ensuing.<br />

From which principle results the following<br />

rule, viz. that the guilt <strong>of</strong> any action ill a drunken<br />

man bears the same proportion to the guilt <strong>of</strong> the<br />

like action in a sober man, that the probability <strong>of</strong><br />

its being the consequence O.f drunkenneS$ bears to ab-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!