30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pronlises. 99<br />

interve" ~jon <strong>of</strong> promises are formal, and is seen and<br />

acknowledged; our jn~tance, therefore, is intended<br />

to show it in the other, where it is not so distinctly .<br />

observed.<br />

II. In what sense Promises are to be interpreted.<br />

\Vhere the terms <strong>of</strong> a promise admit <strong>of</strong> more senses<br />

than one, the Fomiae is to be _ p~rfg..rme4_ " ill tlgt.<br />

se~= in ~hich the proniiser~reh~~ed_at the time<br />

that th~_Dromi~ receivei[il.' -- -<br />

It-is nor-me sense! in which the promiser actually<br />

intended it, that always- governs the interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> an equivocal promise; because at that rate, you<br />

might excite expectations which you never meant,<br />

Much less is it the<br />

nor would be obliged, to satisfy.<br />

sense, in which the promisee actually received ~e<br />

prcmis~; for according to that rule, you might be<br />

drawn i'lto engagements which you never d~gned<br />

to undertake. It must therefore ~ the s~~ (for<br />

there is no other re~ainit:g)· i~ wahich tlie r~o!lliser.<br />

bflieved that ~romisee_ acc~te. _ hiipr.prmse.<br />

This will not differ froDl the actual intention <strong>of</strong><br />

the promiser, where the promise -is given without<br />

collusion or reserve; but we put the rule in the above<br />

form, to exclude evasion in cases in which the popular<br />

Dleaning <strong>of</strong> a.phrase, and the strict grammatical<br />

signification <strong>of</strong> the words· differ, or, in general, wher·<br />

ever the promiser attempts to raake his escape through<br />

some ambiguity in the expressions which he used.<br />

T C11lures promi'ed the garrison <strong>of</strong> Sebasfia, that, if<br />

they ~1(Juld su.rrender, no biood should be shed. The<br />

garrison surrendered; and 1elnures r.,uried them all<br />

alive. Now Temures fulfiI1ed the promise in one sense,<br />

and in the ~ense too in "Thiell he intended it at -the<br />

time; but not in the sense in which the garrison <strong>of</strong><br />

Sebastia actually received it, nor in the sense in which<br />

Tcmures himself knew that the garrison received it :<br />

which last sense~ according to our rule, was the sense<br />

he was in conscience bound to have performed it in.<br />

From the account we have given <strong>of</strong> the obligation .<br />

<strong>of</strong> promises, it is evident, th~t __ ~h.~$ obligation dc; ___ -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!