30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

~t8 <strong>of</strong> Rel;g;~us Establishments,<br />

liberty to contend that the concerns <strong>of</strong> religion were<br />

excepted out <strong>of</strong> the social compact; that in an affair<br />

which can· only be transa~cted between God and a<br />

man's own conscience, no c('mmission or authority<br />

was ever delegated to the civil magistrate, or could<br />

indeed be transferred from the person himself to any<br />

other. We, however, who have rejected this theory.,<br />

because we cannot discover any actual contract<br />

between the state and the people, and because we cannot<br />

aJlow an arbitrary fiction to · be made the founda ..<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> real rights and <strong>of</strong> real obligations, find our ..<br />

selve.. precluded from this distinction~ [The reason·<br />

Jng which deduces the authority <strong>of</strong> civil government<br />

from the will <strong>of</strong> God, and which collects that will<br />

.lrom public expediency alone, binds us to the unre ..<br />

Served conclusion, that the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the magistrate<br />

is limited by no consideration but that o~en-,<br />

eral utilitr : in plainer terms, that whatever be the<br />

~o be regulated, -it is lawful for him to interfere<br />

whenever his interference, in its general tendency,<br />

appears to be conducive to the common interest.<br />

There is nothiiig in the nature <strong>of</strong> religion, as such,<br />

,which exempts it fr·)m the authority <strong>of</strong> the legisla­<br />

, tor, when the safety or welfare <strong>of</strong> the community requires<br />

his interposition. It has been said, indeed,<br />

that religion, pertaining to the interest <strong>of</strong> a life te<br />

; come, lies beyond the province <strong>of</strong> dvil g~~rnment,<br />

. the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> which is confined tf) the affairs <strong>of</strong> this<br />

life. Blit, in reply to this objection, it may be observed,<br />

that when the laws interfere even in religion,<br />

they interfere only with temporals; their effects ter ..<br />

minate, their power operates only upon those rights<br />

'and interests, which confessedly belong to their ill.sposal.<br />

The' acts <strong>of</strong> the legislature, the edicts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

\ prince, the sentence <strong>of</strong> the judge cannot affect my sal.<br />

vation; nor do they, without the most absurd arroi<br />

gance~ pretend to any such power: but they may<br />

, deprive me <strong>of</strong> liberty, <strong>of</strong> property, and even <strong>of</strong> life<br />

\ itself on acco'tnt <strong>of</strong> my religion ; and however I may<br />

l complain <strong>of</strong> the injustice <strong>of</strong> the sentence, by whic .. h 1<br />

\ am condemned, I cannot aUege, that the' magistrate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!