30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OJ"the Adnzmistratifin <strong>of</strong> lustice.<br />

S77<br />

weB as <strong>of</strong> rendering the <strong>of</strong>fice worthy <strong>of</strong> the ambition<br />

<strong>of</strong> men <strong>of</strong> eminence in their pr(Jfession~<br />

A third precaution, to be observed in the forma-)<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> courts <strong>of</strong> justice) h, that the number <strong>of</strong> the<br />

judges be~mall. For, beside that the violence and<br />

tumult insepa.rable from large assembli(:~ are inconsistent<br />

with the patience, luethod, and attention requisite<br />

in judicial investigations; beside that all passions<br />

and prejudices act \\·ith augmented force upon<br />

a collected llluititude; beside these objections, judges,<br />

when they are numerous, diruide the shame <strong>of</strong> an un·<br />

just determination; they shelt~r themselves under one<br />

anotller's example; each man thinks his own charac c<br />

ter hid in the crowd: r for which reason the judges I<br />

ought always to be so few, ;~s that the condu~t <strong>of</strong> each<br />

may be c(;nspicuQus to public observat!on; that each<br />

rna)' be re~ponsjble in his separate and particular reputation<br />

for the decisions iii which he concurs. l'he<br />

truth_ <strong>of</strong> the above remark has been exemplified in<br />

this country, in the effects <strong>of</strong> that wise regulation<br />

which transferred the trial <strong>of</strong> parliamentary elections<br />

from the house <strong>of</strong> t~)mmOilS at large, to a select committee<br />

<strong>of</strong> that house composed <strong>of</strong> thirteen members.<br />

This alteration, simply by reducing the number <strong>of</strong> the<br />

judges, and, in consequence <strong>of</strong> that reduction, expoc<br />

sing the judicial conduct <strong>of</strong> each to public animad.<br />

. version, has given to a judicature, which had been<br />

long swayed by interest and solicitation, the solemnity .<br />

and virtue <strong>of</strong> the most upright tribunals.-I should<br />

prefer an even to an odd number <strong>of</strong> judges, and four<br />

to almost any other number; for in this number<br />

be"ide ttJat it sufficiently sansults the idea <strong>of</strong> separate<br />

responsibility, nothing can be decided bu~ by a rna-<br />

- jority <strong>of</strong> three to one. And when we consider that<br />

every decision establil--hes a perpetual precedent, we<br />

shall allow that it ought to proceed from an author ..<br />

ity not less than this. If the court be equally divi.<br />

ded, nothing is done; things remain as they VI~re ;<br />

with some inconveniency, indeed, to the parties, but<br />

without the -danger to the pU.hlic <strong>of</strong> a hasty prece ..<br />

dent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!