30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Of the Administration <strong>of</strong> JustiGe. ~91<br />

mind <strong>of</strong> the judge, there remains an unavoidable cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> doubt, and a place for contention. ..<br />

Seventhly. The deliberations <strong>of</strong> courts <strong>of</strong> justice "<br />

upon every new question are encumbered with addi ..·<br />

tional difficulties, in consequence <strong>of</strong> the authority ~<br />

which the judgment <strong>of</strong> the court possessef., as a prece- -<br />

dent to future judicatures: which authority appel·· .•<br />

tains not only to the conclu~ions the court delivers,<br />

but to the principles and arguments upon which they<br />

ar~ built. The vi.:~w <strong>of</strong> this effect makes it necessary<br />

for a judge to look beyond the case bt.fore him; and,<br />

beside the attention he owes to the truth and justice<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cau~e between the pat-ties, to reflect whether<br />

the principles, and maxims, and reasoning, which he<br />

adopts and authorizes, can be applied with ~afety to<br />

all cases, which admit <strong>of</strong> a comparison with the pres ..<br />

ent. The decision <strong>of</strong> the cause, wel-e the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

the decision to stop there, might be easy: but the<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> establishing the principle, which such a<br />

decision a,sumes, may be difficult, though <strong>of</strong> the utmost<br />

importance, to be foreseen and regulated.<br />

Finally. After all the certainty and rest that can<br />

be given to points <strong>of</strong> la\v, either by the interposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the legislature, or the authority <strong>of</strong> precedellts, one<br />

principal source <strong>of</strong> disputation, and jnto which in ..<br />

deed the greater part <strong>of</strong> legal controversies may be{<br />

resolved,. wiil rem~in ~til1, namely~ "_tht:_~o~etition<br />

<strong>of</strong> oppo~1te analogIes." When a polfit Of law as been<br />

oriCe"idjudgeo, neIther that question, nor any which<br />

comp,letely and in all it~ circumstant.:es cori-e5ponds<br />

with that, can be brougllt a second titlle into dispute:<br />

but questions arise, wnich resemble this only indi.<br />

rectty and ill part, in certaill vie\v's and circumstallCC8,<br />

and \v11ich may seem to bear all equal or a greater at:'<br />

finity to other adjudged cases; questions, which can be<br />

brought within any affixed rule only by analogy, and<br />

which hold a relation by atlalogy to differellt rule~<br />

It is by the urging <strong>of</strong> the different analogies that thJ./<br />

contention <strong>of</strong> the Bar is carried on : and it is in thL<br />

comparison, adjustment, and reconciliation <strong>of</strong> them<br />

with one another; in the di~cel"nilli <strong>of</strong> such d~l·f'C:)<br />

R B B

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!