30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Duty <strong>of</strong> Parents. 225<br />

Ination <strong>of</strong> these virtues be well founded, it must be<br />

owing not ~o their inferior impojiGnt~~ but to som;<br />

defect or impurity in the motive. And inatcl It<br />

cannot be denied, but that it is in the power <strong>of</strong> mlociation,<br />

so to unite our ('hildren's interest with our<br />

own, as that we should <strong>of</strong>ten pursue both from the<br />

same motive, 'place both in· the same object, and<br />

with as little sense <strong>of</strong> duty in one pursuit as in tbe<br />

other. \Vhere this is the case, the judgment above<br />

stated is not far from the truth. And so <strong>of</strong>ten as we<br />

find a solicitous care <strong>of</strong> a man's own family, in a total<br />

absence or extreme penury <strong>of</strong> every other virtue,<br />

or inteifering with other duties, or directing its<br />

operation solely to the temporal happiness <strong>of</strong> the children,<br />

placing that happiness and amusement in indulgence<br />

whilst they are young, or in advancement <strong>of</strong><br />

fort:lne when they grow up, there is reason to belie".,e<br />

that .this is the case. In this way the common<br />

opinion concerning these duties may. pe ~ accounted<br />

for and defended. If we look to the -subject <strong>of</strong><br />

them, we perceive them to be indi~ensable: if we<br />

regard the motive, we find them <strong>of</strong>ten not very meritorious.<br />

Wherefore, although a man seldom riseS" high<br />

in Otlr esteem \vho has nothing to recommend him<br />

beside the care <strong>of</strong> his own family, yet \ve always condemn<br />

the neglect <strong>of</strong> this duty with the utmost severity<br />

; both by reason <strong>of</strong> the manifest and immediate mis ..<br />

chief which we see arising from this neglect, and because<br />

it argues a want not only <strong>of</strong> parental affection,<br />

but <strong>of</strong> those moral principles s which ought to come<br />

in aid <strong>of</strong> that affection, where it is wanting. And<br />

if, on the other hand, our praise and esteem <strong>of</strong> these<br />

duties be not proportioned to the good they produce,<br />

or to the indignation with which we resent the ab.<br />

sence <strong>of</strong> them, it is for this reason, that virtue is<br />

the most valuable, not where it prod'lres the luost<br />

good, but where it is the most want~d; Wllich is<br />

not the case here; because its place is <strong>of</strong>ten s'opplied<br />

by instincts, or involuntary as:rociations. ~~~verthe.<br />

less, the <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> a parent may be discharged frem ~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!