30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pronziscs. 97<br />

rice <strong>of</strong> the demand upon him, he may conscientiously<br />

plead this limitation; because he applies tbe rule <strong>of</strong><br />

law to the purpose for which it was intended. But when<br />

he refuses to pay a debt, <strong>of</strong> the reality <strong>of</strong> whlt;:h he<br />

is conscious, he cannot, as before, plead thE' intention<br />

<strong>of</strong> the statute, and the supreme authority <strong>of</strong><br />

law, unless he could shew, that the law intended to in.<br />

terpose its supreme authority, to acquit men <strong>of</strong> debts,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the existence and justice <strong>of</strong> which they were themselves<br />

sensible.. Again, to preserve youth fro·m the<br />

practices and impositions, to which their inexperience<br />

expo~es them, the law compels the payment <strong>of</strong><br />

110 debts inclirred within a certain age, nor the performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> any engagements, ex-cept for such necessaries<br />

as are su.ited to . their condition and fortunes. .<br />

If a young person therefore perceive that he has been<br />

- .practiced or imposed upon, he may honestly avail<br />

himself <strong>of</strong> the privilege <strong>of</strong> his non-age to defeat the<br />

circumvention. But, if he shelter himself under this I ;<br />

privilege, to avoid a fair obligation, or.an equitable<br />

t<br />

H<br />

contract, he extends the privilege to a·case, in which<br />

it is not allowed by intention <strong>of</strong> law, .and in wliich r<br />

consequently, it does not, in natural justice, exif.~.<br />

As property is the principal subject <strong>of</strong> justice,. or<br />

"<strong>of</strong> the determinate relative duties,'" we have put<br />

down what we had to say upon it in the first place:<br />

\ve no\\' proceed to state these duties in the ·.best order<br />

we can.<br />

PROMISES.<br />

I. !JROM whence the oblil')tion to peifornLProm­<br />

Zlc .. r arIses.<br />

II. In what sense Promises are to h.-, interpreted.<br />

III. In what rases Promius (ire not bindi.1g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!