30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

266 lJulyand £1Ii(/](.,v if Pl·i.7,,\'cr.<br />

the instrument <strong>of</strong> happiness and misery to another j<br />

which is perfectly <strong>of</strong> a piece with the cnurse and order<br />

that obtain, and \vhich \\-c Inu~t believe \\-cre intcndt'd<br />

to obtain, in human affairs. \Vhy may we not he as~<br />

sisted by the prayers <strong>of</strong> other men, who arc behC'Iden<br />

for our support to their labour? '\7h}· may not<br />

our happiness be made in SOOlC cases to depend upon<br />

the intercession, as it certainly does in lnan)", upon<br />

the good <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> cur neighbours? 1'he happiness<br />

and misery <strong>of</strong> great numbers we see <strong>of</strong>tentimes at the<br />

disposal <strong>of</strong> one man's choice, or liable to be much affected<br />

by his conduct: what greater difficulty is there<br />

in supposing, that the prayers <strong>of</strong> an individual may<br />

avert a calamity from 111ultitudes, or be accepted to<br />

the benefit <strong>of</strong> \vhole communities ?<br />

CHAPTER<br />

III.<br />

PF THE DUTY AND EFFICACY OF PRAYER,<br />

1\8 REPRESENTED IN SCRlp·fURE.<br />

THE reader will have ob~erved, that the re·<br />

~ections stated in the preceding Chapter, whatever<br />

truth and \veight they may be allo\ved to contain,<br />

rise niany <strong>of</strong> them no higller, than to negative arguments<br />

in favour <strong>of</strong> the propriety <strong>of</strong> addressing prayer<br />

to God. To prove that the ~fficacy <strong>of</strong> prayer is not<br />

inconsistent \vith the attributes <strong>of</strong> the l)eity, does<br />

not prove that prayers are actually efficacious ; and<br />

in the want <strong>of</strong> that unequivocal tc:.,timony "",'hich experience<br />

alone could afford to this point, (but which<br />

we do llot possess, and have seerl good reason why'<br />

we are not to expect) the light <strong>of</strong> nature Jeaves us<br />

to controverted probabilities, dra\vn from tIle impulse<br />

by which all nlaIlkind ha\Tc been almost uni ...<br />

versally prompted to devotion, and from som.e ben.<br />

eficial purposes, which, it is conceived, may be bet.<br />

ter answered by the audience <strong>of</strong> prayer, than by any<br />

other mode <strong>of</strong> communicating the same blessings.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!