30.12.2013 Views

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

PHI LOS 0 P H Y . - Classic Works of Apologetics Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Polygamy. 211<br />

they may be likely to form and bring up families <strong>of</strong><br />

tlleir o\vn, upon wh~th the increase and succession <strong>of</strong><br />

the human species in a great degree depend; this is<br />

less provided for, and less practicable, wnere twenty<br />

or thirty children a.re to be supported by the attention<br />

and fOI"tunes <strong>of</strong> one t~lther, than if they were<br />

divided into five or six farnilies, to each <strong>of</strong> which<br />

were as~igned the industry a;;d inheritance ryf tw'J<br />

parents.<br />

. 'Vherher simultaneous ?olygamy was permitted<br />

by the Jaw <strong>of</strong> Moses, seem& tloubrful:· bllt \\~tlether<br />

permitted or not, it was ct:Ttainly p!·actised by the<br />

Jewish . patriarch~, both befote that Iaw~ aJld under<br />

it. The permission, if there was any, might be l;ke<br />

that <strong>of</strong> di\~orce, " for the hardness <strong>of</strong> th~ir heart,"<br />

in condescension to their established indulgences,<br />

:father than fron} tIle general rectitude or propriety<br />

<strong>of</strong> the thing itself. The state <strong>of</strong> manners in Judea<br />

had probably undergone a r~formation in this respect<br />

before the time <strong>of</strong> ClJrist, for in the New Testament<br />

\\~e meet vlith no trace<br />

.<br />

or lnention <strong>of</strong>" anv such<br />

~<br />

practice being tJierated. -<br />

For \\1hich -r(~ason, and because it was likewise ferbidden<br />

anl()n~st the Greeks and Romans, we cannot<br />

expect to find any e~:press law upon the subject<br />

in the Chr{stian code. The words <strong>of</strong> Christ,t l\iatt.<br />

xix. 9. may be construed by an easJ! implication to<br />

prohibit polygamy; for, if "whoever putteth away<br />

his 'sife, and 1110rrieth anc.!her, commiteth adultery,"<br />

he who marrieth another witbout putting away the<br />

first is no less guilty <strong>of</strong> adultery; because the adultery<br />

d~es not consi~t in the repudiation <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

wife (for, however unjust or crud that may be, it is<br />

not adultery) but in entering into a second mar,.<br />

riage during the legal existence and obligation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first. The sever,,1 passages in St. Paul's writjng~,<br />

. which speak <strong>of</strong> marriage, dways suppose it to signify<br />

• S ee D tut. XVII. .. 17 • XXI .,,, •••.,.<br />

t "I say unto you~ \Vhoso('vrr shall put :l\vay his Wife, etrept it h~ fot<br />

forJ)iC'atin'i: and ,haJJ nla!'r~ anothe:, cnmnlit:('.h adultery"

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!