transport of dangerous goods and risk management - Kirilo SaviÄ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RISK MANAGEMENT 214The tender documents for the Department of Traffic and Transportation defines what is considered necessaryfinancially and economically, as well sufficient technical and human capacity. When defining the conditions forparticipation in the Department of Traffic and transport must see to it that they do not discriminate against bidders,and that the logical connection with the subject of public procurement exists.After a period of 30 days, is the public opening of received applications. The Commission, appointed by decision ofthe competent officers, is checking the correctness of submitted documents and creates a list of bidders who havesubmitted complete and correct document. In the period of 15 days, the Commission makes a tour of the Bidder andcontrols the data submitted with the tender documents. After a period of 15 days is the public opening of bidsreceived, which relate to the price. The Commission brings their observations and assessments from the control ofthe bidder who submitted the correct application. After that, commissions in accordance with defined criteria: cost,quality of service, payment terms, technical and technological characteristics of the transport vehicles, using themethods of multicriteria evaluation selects the best bid. Based on the results of application of multicriteriaevaluation metod, a list of rankied bidders according to the above-defined criteria is got. Contracting is doneaccording to this ranking.DETERMINATION OF RELATIVE WEIGHT CRITERIAIn order to make good decision, it is needed to specify the alternatives by defining appropriate criteria, with thedetermination of weight coefficients for each criterion. Given that all the criteria for the variants ranking don’t haveidentical impact on observed problem, the question of determining their relative weight appears. In the process ofevaluation on the multicriteria basis, determination of the relative weight of individual criteria is the biggestproblem and the most sensitive place that can decisively influence the final results of the evaluation.In order to determine the relative weight of criteria, interviewing of experts was conducted, and then rankingmethod was applied to the resulted data, for which [4] an application for the calculation of the relative weight ofcriteria was made. By using the application in just a few steps we come to the relative weight of criteria that areshown in Figure 2.Figure 2. The relative weight of criteriaTo verify the proper selection of experts, and thus in a certain way to ensure the validity of the results, it wasnecessary to do the assessment of competence of experts investigated. This procedure was carried out according tothe approach developed in [5]. Since this procedure is a modification of the known methods for the assessment ofcompetence of experts, and that is adapted to the needs of research in the field of transport support of the defensesystem, it was necessary to perform only minor adjustment of procedure in specific problem and situation.
TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RISK MANAGEMENT 215According to [5], acceptable coefficient of competence of group of experts would be considered the coefficient witha value greather than 0,5. As the average coefficient of competence of experts surveyed is K = 0733, we can say thatexperts are competent.DESCRIPTION OF DEFINED CRITERION EOR SELECTION OF TRANSPORT COMPANIESHaving considered the market conditions for doing business, as well as specific military organization, inaccordance with [3] and by interviewing experts in the field of traffic and transportation in the defensesystem, to solve the above problems we propose the use of the following criteria:1. cost services,2. quality of transport services,3. terms of payment,4. technical and technological characteristics.CRITERIA 1 - SERVICES COSTCost of services as criterion is described via offered price. Each bidder for submitted offer gets certain scorescalculates by pattern (1):R C (1)tez minBBCiCii = 1,… nn = number of offers,Rtez = 33 - relative veight of criteria,Cmin - minimum offered price,Ci – price ofi th-bidder.CRITERIA 2 - QUALITY OF TRANSPORT SERVICESThe quality of transport services is a term that is described by a lot of parameters. For the purposes of defined modelit is proposed to assess the quality of transport services through the following parameters:reliability - this parameter shows the number of missing (canceled) request by the bidder,security - a parameter that should be considered through the relative safety indicator, using the number oftraffic accidents (SbN) on 100,000 km,Environmental Protection – should be considered through the characteristics of engines that are beingused by the transportation vehicles, in terms of use of engines with the Euro standards,ITS applications - this parameter should give information if intelligent transportation systems to trackcargo and vehicles have been applied.The number of points that each bidder gets is calculated according to the forms from 2 to 4:
Page 1 and 2:
ISBN 978-86-83059-06-5Editor-in-Chi
Page 3 and 4:
TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODSAND RIS
Page 5 and 6:
EDITORIALLand transport Pan- Europe
Page 7 and 8:
Contents:INTEGRATED MODEL AND INFOR
Page 9 and 10:
TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RI
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 3. Algorithm of Security Dat
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 5. Algorithm of Ship Waste M
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 7. Original Algorithm of Imp
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 11. Original Algorithm of th
Page 27 and 28:
Figure 13. Original Algorithm of th
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 15. Original Algorithm of Ot
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 18. The original algorithm o
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 20. Original Algorithm of Ac
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 23. Original Algorithm of In
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 25. Original Algorithm of Ac
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Table 1. Classification of waste th
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3 Classification of waste tha
Page 63 and 64:
Table 3b Classification of waste th
Page 65 and 66:
Table 3d: Classification of waste t
Page 67 and 68:
Table 3f: Classification of waste t
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Table 6 Classes of the compounds th
Page 77 and 78:
Table 6b Classes of the compounds t
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Table 8. Typical hazardous waste ma
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 5.- Life cycle for oiled sol
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 13. Original algorithm of th
Page 107 and 108:
Software part of Sledat systemTRANS
Page 109 and 110:
BIBLIOGRAPHYTRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
UDK:614.83:624.21TRANSPORT OF DANGE
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172: TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RI
Page 177 and 178: INTEGRATED C4I SYSTEMSTRANSPORT OF
Page 211 and 212: UDK:355.69614.878.084TRANSPORT OF D
Page 221: TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RI
Page 253 and 254: Oil, gas and mineralsTRANSPORT OF D
Page 257 and 258: UDK:811.111'25TRANSPORT OF DANGEROU
Page 267: CIP - Каталогизација
show all

transport of dangerous goods and risk management - Kirilo SaviÄ

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

transport of dangerous goods and risk management - Kirilo SaviÄ