transport of dangerous goods and risk management - Kirilo SaviÄ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RISK MANAGEMENT 218• the number of points for possession of appropriate certificates:BSiRtez Si (8)B BS maxRtez = 19 - relative weight of criteria,BS and - the number of drivers and the bidders-certified,BS max – the maximum number of drivers with certificates offered.When calculated for each bid the number of points for each parameter, the calculation of the arithmetic mean of theobtained points is performed, and that data comes in multi-criteria evaluation, as an information on technical andtechnological characteristics of a particular bidder.In the described model, the importance of applying methods of multi-criteria evaluation in choosing the winning bidis. Analyzing the nature of the problem of choice of a transport company, the method of analytical hierarchy processstands out as the most suitable, as it provides a complete ranking of alternatives based on multiple criteria with thepossibility of decomposing the problem on several levels.In Figure 3 was performed the decomposition into a hierarchical structure of the problem of the transport companychoice for the needs of transport of dangerous goods.Level 1GoalThe choice of carriersLevel 2CriteriaC-1PriceC-2quality of transportservicesC-3Terms ofpaymentC-4Technical andtechnologicalcharacteristicsLevel 3Sub-criteriaSc 1Sc 2Sc 3Sc s Sc s+1Level 4AlternativeOffer No. 1Offer No. 2Offer No. 3Offer No. nFigure 3. The hierarchy model of choice of transport enterprisesThus defined hierarchical structure is transferred to the software package Expert Choice [6], that leads in a coupleof steps to the final ranking of alternatives, Figure 4. In order to view the possibility of using this method, values offour bidders are included into the software.
TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RISK MANAGEMENT 219Figure 4. The final version of application of Expert softwareAs a way out from the software we get rank of alternatives on which basis in the next phase we do the contractingwith the most successfull bidder.CONCLUSIONThe time in which we live is characterized by a number of reorganization in order to "convergence" of our countryto developed European and world countries. Changes are present in almost all spheres of economic and social lifeand in the SA as one of the most important state institutions. What is it to emphasize the technical - technologicalmodernization in which the material and human resources will be used much more productively and efficiently.Serbian Army is unable to meet by its own means all transportation requirements that its units have the need of asusers, especially when it comes to transport of hazardous materials. With this raises the question of economy andself-satisfaction of all claims. According to the existing way, selection is made only by the criterion of the lowestoffered price, which results in that the transport requirements implemented with low-quality services, unsafe andwith frequent denunciations.Quantity of transported goods in the last few years has the trend of continuous growth. Every year on the roadsacross Europe transporting of hazardous materials is increasing. In this way, the emerging risks of traffic accidentswith hazardous materials increases. The problem of efficient and safe transport of dangerous goods is amultidimensional problem that needs to be viewed from several angles and from several aspects.The paper has taken into consideration the possibility of realization of the transport of dangerous goods for theneeds of SA using the service transport companies, in order to reduce transport costs and improve the quality ofimplementation thereof. The focus of the work was aimed at defining the model of choice of the transport company.
Page 1 and 2:
ISBN 978-86-83059-06-5Editor-in-Chi
Page 3 and 4:
TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODSAND RIS
Page 5 and 6:
EDITORIALLand transport Pan- Europe
Page 7 and 8:
Contents:INTEGRATED MODEL AND INFOR
Page 9 and 10:
TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RI
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 3. Algorithm of Security Dat
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 5. Algorithm of Ship Waste M
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 7. Original Algorithm of Imp
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 11. Original Algorithm of th
Page 27 and 28:
Figure 13. Original Algorithm of th
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 15. Original Algorithm of Ot
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 18. The original algorithm o
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 20. Original Algorithm of Ac
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 23. Original Algorithm of In
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 25. Original Algorithm of Ac
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Table 1. Classification of waste th
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3 Classification of waste tha
Page 63 and 64:
Table 3b Classification of waste th
Page 65 and 66:
Table 3d: Classification of waste t
Page 67 and 68:
Table 3f: Classification of waste t
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Table 6 Classes of the compounds th
Page 77 and 78:
Table 6b Classes of the compounds t
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Table 8. Typical hazardous waste ma
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 5.- Life cycle for oiled sol
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 13. Original algorithm of th
Page 107 and 108:
Software part of Sledat systemTRANS
Page 109 and 110:
BIBLIOGRAPHYTRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
UDK:614.83:624.21TRANSPORT OF DANGE
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176: TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RI
Page 177 and 178: INTEGRATED C4I SYSTEMSTRANSPORT OF
Page 211 and 212: UDK:355.69614.878.084TRANSPORT OF D
Page 225: TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS AND RI
Page 253 and 254: Oil, gas and mineralsTRANSPORT OF D
Page 257 and 258: UDK:811.111'25TRANSPORT OF DANGEROU
Page 267: CIP - Каталогизација
show all

transport of dangerous goods and risk management - Kirilo SaviÄ

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

transport of dangerous goods and risk management - Kirilo SaviÄ