12.12.2012 Views

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

asic principles for emotional processing 101<br />

In <strong>the</strong> presence of fear-arousing stimuli, activation of <strong>the</strong> amygdala will<br />

lead working memory to receive a greater number of inputs and inputs of a<br />

greater variety than in <strong>the</strong> presence of emotionally neutral stimuli. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

extra inputs may add affective charge to working memory representations<br />

and may be what make a particular subjective experience a fearful emotional<br />

experience.<br />

What kinds of emotional experience do nonhuman animals without a<br />

well-developed prefrontal cortex have? It might be possible to have certain<br />

kinds of modality-specific conscious state when <strong>the</strong> activity of one system<br />

dominates <strong>the</strong> brain (LeDoux, 2002). This might happen with strong sensory<br />

stimulation (loud noise or painful stimulus) or in response to emotionally<br />

charged stimuli (sight of a predator). Modality-specific feelings can be<br />

thought of in terms of passive states of awareness, as opposed to <strong>the</strong> more<br />

flexible kind of conscious awareness, complete with on-line decisionmaking<br />

capacities, made possible by working memory.<br />

Although this <strong>the</strong>ory of emotional experience is based on studies of<br />

fear, it is meant as a general-purpose <strong>the</strong>ory that applies to all kinds of<br />

emotional experience. <strong>The</strong> particulars will be different, but <strong>the</strong> overall<br />

scheme (whereby working memory integrates sensory information about <strong>the</strong><br />

immediately present physical stimulus with memories from past experiences<br />

with such stimuli and with <strong>the</strong> current emotional consequences of those<br />

stimuli) will apply to all varieties of emotional experience in humans, from<br />

fear to anger to joy to dread and even love and appetitive emotions (Everitt<br />

& Robbins, 1992; Gaffan, 1992; Hatfield et al., 1996; Rolls, 1998; LeDoux,<br />

2002; Yang et al., 2002).<br />

WHAT ABOUT POSITIVE EMOTIONS?<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r researchers have studied <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> amygdala in processing stimuli<br />

that predict desirable things (e.g., tasty foods and sexually receptive partners).<br />

So what about love? <strong>The</strong> key issue is whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is some way to<br />

study <strong>the</strong> function in nonhuman animals that makes sense in terms of<br />

human behavior. For fear, we were able to use conditioning because conditioned<br />

fear responses are similar in humans and o<strong>the</strong>r mammals. <strong>The</strong> paradigm<br />

for behavioral love has been to focus on pair bonding, in <strong>the</strong> sense of<br />

a long-term bond between sexual partners. Application of this paradigm is<br />

based on comparison of species in which animals do and do not pair up with<br />

one ano<strong>the</strong>r monogamously (Insel, 1997; Carter, 1998). Only about 3% of<br />

mammals are monogamous. Even in nonhuman primates, monogamy is fairly<br />

rare; but prairie voles, small rodents living in <strong>the</strong> Midwestern plains of <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!