12.12.2012 Views

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

360 conclusions<br />

directly and by providing positive or negative reinforcement for<br />

learning processes that will affect perceptual, motor, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

schemas. Figure 12.1 shows <strong>the</strong> latter in terms of <strong>the</strong> action of<br />

dopamine neurons providing <strong>the</strong> reinforcement for an actor–<br />

critic architecture for reinforcement learning in <strong>the</strong> basal ganglia<br />

(Fellous & Suri, 2003; Prescott, Gurney, & Redgrave, 2003).<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> hippocampus provides a representation of context, most<br />

notably by activation of place cells encoding <strong>the</strong> animal’s place<br />

in space. Dynamic remapping is <strong>the</strong> process whereby this representation<br />

may be updated on <strong>the</strong> basis of an efferent copy of<br />

<strong>the</strong> animal’s actions even when sensory data on <strong>the</strong> new context<br />

or location may be missing.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> hippocampal representation is now seen in greater generality<br />

as encoding any situation that is linked to a node in <strong>the</strong><br />

animal’s WG. Thus, <strong>the</strong> hippocampus is seen as providing <strong>the</strong><br />

“you are here” function; it must be integrated with <strong>the</strong> WG to<br />

provide a full cognitive map linking current position with current<br />

goals to determine a path through <strong>the</strong> world which will<br />

achieve one or more of <strong>the</strong>m. Thus, premotor action selection<br />

becomes embedded within <strong>the</strong> prefrontal planning behavior<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> WG, planning which depends crucially on<br />

representations of goal states and internal states (inputs not<br />

shown) as well as a combination of <strong>the</strong> current situation and <strong>the</strong><br />

available affordances (Guazzelli, Bota, & Arbib, 2001).<br />

An Evolutionary Approach to Heated Appraisals<br />

In item (3) of <strong>the</strong> analysis of my emotional narrative (see above, “<strong>The</strong> Narrative<br />

Chronologically Rearranged and Annotated”), I stated <strong>the</strong> following:<br />

an emotional state may be “terminated” when a plan is completed<br />

which addresses <strong>the</strong> source of that state; or it may simply dissipate<br />

when alternative plans are made. However, if some major goal has<br />

been rendered unattainable by some event, <strong>the</strong> negative emotion<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> event may not be dissipated by embarking on<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r plans, since <strong>the</strong>y do not approach <strong>the</strong> goal.<br />

This analysis, and o<strong>the</strong>rs elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> above section, seems at first to be<br />

very much in <strong>the</strong> spirit of appraisal <strong>the</strong>ories of emotion (e.g., Ortony, Clore,<br />

& Collins, 1988). However, while Ortony, Clore and Collins admit that visceral<br />

sensations and facial expressions set emotions apart from o<strong>the</strong>r psychological<br />

states, <strong>the</strong>y exclude <strong>the</strong>se from <strong>the</strong>ir study (Arbib, 1992). <strong>The</strong>y

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!