12.12.2012 Views

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eware <strong>the</strong> passionate robot 355<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a director of action. In o<strong>the</strong>r cases, <strong>the</strong> précis of schema activity<br />

plays <strong>the</strong> crucial role in determining <strong>the</strong> future course of schema activity<br />

and, thus, of action.<br />

FROM DRIVES TO FEELINGS<br />

Our conceptual evolutionary analysis has allowed us to tease apart a variety<br />

of visual mechanisms and relate <strong>the</strong>m to a range of behaviors, from <strong>the</strong><br />

feeding and fleeing of <strong>the</strong> frog to <strong>the</strong> visual control of hand movements in<br />

monkeys and humans. We briefly examined accounts of <strong>the</strong> evolution of<br />

language and a particularly human type of consciousness. We saw that this<br />

type of consciousness builds upon a more general form of consciousness—<br />

awareness of both internal and external states—that we did not explain but<br />

for which we made a crucial observation: activities in regions of <strong>the</strong> cerebral<br />

cortex can differ in <strong>the</strong>ir access to awareness. However, although we<br />

looked at visual processing involved in what some might label two “emotional<br />

behaviors” in <strong>the</strong> frog—feeding and fleeing—we did not explicitly<br />

discuss ei<strong>the</strong>r motivation or emotion, beyond suggesting that nonhumans<br />

may be aware of subtle social cues or <strong>the</strong> difference between feeling maternal<br />

and feeling enraged and noting that nonhuman primates have a call<br />

system and orofacial gestures expressive of a limited range of emotional<br />

and related social indicators. <strong>The</strong> time has come to put <strong>the</strong>se insights to<br />

work. As stated above, some would use <strong>the</strong> term emotion to cover <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

range of motivated behavior, whereas o<strong>the</strong>rs (myself included) stress <strong>the</strong><br />

emergent subtlety of emotions. <strong>The</strong> following section will briefly review<br />

an account of motivated behavior in toads and rats, <strong>the</strong>n use this basis toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with <strong>the</strong> insights from <strong>the</strong> Jacksonian analysis above to offer an integrated<br />

perspective on <strong>the</strong> evolutionary insights provided by Kelley, Rolls,<br />

and Fellous & LeDoux in Chapters 3–5.<br />

Basic Models of Motivation<br />

Karl Pribram (1960) has quipped that <strong>the</strong> limbic system is responsible for<br />

<strong>the</strong> “four Fs:” Feeding, Fighting, Fleeing, and Reproduction. It is interesting<br />

that three of <strong>the</strong> four have a strong social component. In any case, <strong>the</strong> notion<br />

to be developed in this section is that <strong>the</strong> animal comes with a set of<br />

basic drives—for hunger, thirst, sex, self-preservation, etc.—and that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> basic motor, or motivation, for behavior. This will <strong>the</strong>n ground<br />

our subsequent discussion of motivation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!